问题
I'm working on a NES emulator right now and I'm having trouble figuring out how to render the pixels. I am using a 3 dimensional array to hold the RGB value of each pixel. The array definition looks like this for the 256 x 224 screen size:
byte screenData[224][256][3];
For example, [0][0][0]
holds the blue value, [0][0][1]
holds the green values and [0][0][2]
holds the red value of the pixel at screen position [0][0]
.
When the vblank flag goes high, I need to render the screen. When SDL goes to render the screen, the screenData array will be full of the RGB values for each pixel. I was able to find a function named SDL_CreateRGBSurfaceFrom
that looked like it may work for what I want to do. However, all of the examples I have seen use 1 dimensional arrays for the RGB values and not a 3 dimensional array.
What would be the best way for me to render my pixels? It would also be nice if the function allowed me to resize the surface somehow so I didn't have to use a 256 x 224 window size.
回答1:
You need to store the data as an unidimensional char
array:
int channels = 3; // for a RGB image
char* pixels = new char[img_width * img_height * channels];
// populate pixels with real data ...
SDL_Surface *surface = SDL_CreateRGBSurfaceFrom((void*)pixels,
img_width,
img_height,
channels * 8, // bits per pixel = 24
img_width * channels, // pitch
0x0000FF, // red mask
0x00FF00, // green mask
0xFF0000, // blue mask
0); // alpha mask (none)
回答2:
In 2.0, use SDL_Texture
+ SDL_TEXTUREACCESS_STREAMING
+ SDL_RenderCopy
, it's faster than SDL_RenderPoint
.
See:
- official example: http://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/file/e12c38730512/test/teststreaming.c
- my derived example which does not require blob data and compares both methods: https://github.com/cirosantilli/cpp-cheat/blob/0607da1236030d2e1ec56256a0d12cadb6924a41/sdl/plot2d.c
Related: Why do I get bad performance with SDL2 and SDL_RenderCopy inside a double for loop over all pixels?
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20753726/rendering-pixels-from-array-of-rgb-values-in-sdl-1-2