Is <article> okay for truncated posts?

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-12-12 16:12:05

问题


I'm making a Tumblr theme (hold your criticism) and I'd like to use some semantic tags (since this seems to be something most themes don't have.) The way these blogs are styled is a main page full of posts that may be truncated, and may not be. You can then click a link and get a permalink to that post, or the full post if it's truncated.

I want to use <article> for these posts on the main page, but I don't know if it's okay to put a truncated post in an <article> tag. I'd guess it'd be okay since the RSS feed could supply a link to the full article, but then would the full article also use <article> tags? Is <section> more applicable, even though some posts are perfectly fit for syndication?


回答1:


From the documentation, article (bold is from me):

The article element represents a complete, or self-contained, composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is, in principle, independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in syndication. This could be a forum post, a magazine or newspaper article, a blog entry, a user-submitted comment, an interactive widget or gadget, or any other independent item of content.

So article represents not only complete, but self-contained composition in document too, as bolded above, that means, truncated posts fits article element too.

section on the other hand (bold is from me):

The section element represents a generic section of a document or application. A section, in this context, is a thematic grouping of content. The theme of each section should be identified, typically by including a heading (h1-h6 element) as a child of the section element.

So section should not include posts or their fragments directly.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23692612/is-article-okay-for-truncated-posts

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!