Issues regarding constraint's setting via mystic package

≡放荡痞女 提交于 2019-12-11 18:31:40

问题


I am trying to set constraints to perform optimization with the help of mystic package.

I executed the code in Spyder and PyCharm IDE. In both cases kernel crashed. When I have only 2 line string 'simplify'-method works fine. Trying to set greater than 2 lines constraints leads to kernel's death.

import mystic.symbolic as ms

equation = """
x0*7.2 + x1*1.9 + x2*35.7 + x3*4.1 + x4*23.0 + x5*19.2 + x6*0.0 + x7*0.0 + x8*0.0 + x9*0.0 + x10*10.1 + x11*10.8 + x12*11.3 + x13*14.8 + x14*78.6 + x15*5.8 + x16*3.4 + x17*1.8 + x18*3.4 + x19*1.0 + x20*2.9 + x21*0.0 + x22*0.0 + x23*0.0 + x24*0.0 + x25*0.0 + x26*0.0 + x27*0.0 + x28*0.0 + x29*0.0 >= 27.0
x0*7.2 + x1*1.9 + x2*35.9 + x3*4.1 + x4*23.0 + x5*19.2 + x6*0.0 + x7*0.0 + x8*0.0 + x9*0.0 + x10*9.8 + x11*10.9 + x12*27.1 + x13*15.0 + x14*78.7 + x15*5.8 + x16*3.4 + x17*1.8 + x18*3.4 + x19*1.0 + x20*2.9 + x21*0.0 + x22*0.0 + x23*0.0 + x24*0.0 + x25*0.0 + x26*0.0 + x27*0.0 + x28*0.0 + x29*0.0 >= 29.0
x0*7.2 + x1*1.9 + x2*35.9 + x3*4.1 + x4*23.0 + x5*19.2 + x6*0.0 + x7*0.0 + x8*0.0 + x9*0.0 + x10*9.8 + x11*10.9 + x12*27.1 + x13*15.0 + x14*78.7 + x15*5.8 + x16*3.4 + x17*1.8 + x18*3.4 + x19*1.0 + x20*2.9 + x21*0.0 + x22*0.0 + x23*0.0 + x24*0.0 + x25*0.0 + x26*0.0 + x27*0.0 + x28*0.0 + x29*0.0 >= 29.0
x0*0.0 + x1*0.0 + x2*0.0 + x3*0.0 + x4*0.0 + x5*0.0 + x6*27.9 + x7*73.0 + x8*230.9 + x9*107.3 + x10*0.0 + x11*0.0 + x12*0.0 + x13*0.0 + x14*0.0 + x15*0.0 + x16*0.0 + x17*0.0 + x18*0.0 + x19*0.0 + x20*0.0 + x21*13.7 + x22*63.7 + x23*29.5 + x24*7.2 + x25*24.3 + x26*9.6 + x27*142.1 + x28*10.5 + x29*41.0 >= 420.0
x0*0.0 + x1*0.0 + x2*0.0 + x3*0.0 + x4*0.0 + x5*0.0 + x6*27.2 + x7*72.9 + x8*88.5 + x9*107.3 + x10*0.0 + x11*0.0 + x12*0.0 + x13*0.0 + x14*0.0 + x15*0.0 + x16*0.0 + x17*0.0 + x18*0.0 + x19*0.0 + x20*0.0 + x21*13.7 + x22*63.7 + x23*29.5 + x24*7.2 + x25*23.6 + x26*9.6 + x27*142.1 + x28*10.3 + x29*37.0 >= 420.0
"""

eqn = ms.simplify(equation)

回答1:


You are probably just hitting your memory limit, or something like that. I'd suggest to turn off iterating through all solutions, and turn on cycling the variable solved for.

>>> import mystic.symbolic as ms
>>> equation = """
... x0*7.2 + x1*1.9 + x2*35.7 + x3*4.1 + x4*23.0 + x5*19.2 + x6*0.0 + x7*0.0 + x8*0.0 + x9*0.0 + x10*10.1 + x11*10.8 + x12*11.3 + x13*14.8 + x14*78.6 + x15*5.8 + x16*3.4 + x17*1.8 + x18*3.4 + x19*1.0 + x20*2.9 + x21*0.0 + x22*0.0 + x23*0.0 + x24*0.0 + x25*0.0 + x26*0.0 + x27*0.0 + x28*0.0 + x29*0.0 >= 27.0
... x0*7.2 + x1*1.9 + x2*35.9 + x3*4.1 + x4*23.0 + x5*19.2 + x6*0.0 + x7*0.0 + x8*0.0 + x9*0.0 + x10*9.8 + x11*10.9 + x12*27.1 + x13*15.0 + x14*78.7 + x15*5.8 + x16*3.4 + x17*1.8 + x18*3.4 + x19*1.0 + x20*2.9 + x21*0.0 + x22*0.0 + x23*0.0 + x24*0.0 + x25*0.0 + x26*0.0 + x27*0.0 + x28*0.0 + x29*0.0 >= 29.0
... x0*7.2 + x1*1.9 + x2*35.9 + x3*4.1 + x4*23.0 + x5*19.2 + x6*0.0 + x7*0.0 + x8*0.0 + x9*0.0 + x10*9.8 + x11*10.9 + x12*27.1 + x13*15.0 + x14*78.7 + x15*5.8 + x16*3.4 + x17*1.8 + x18*3.4 + x19*1.0 + x20*2.9 + x21*0.0 + x22*0.0 + x23*0.0 + x24*0.0 + x25*0.0 + x26*0.0 + x27*0.0 + x28*0.0 + x29*0.0 >= 29.0
... x0*0.0 + x1*0.0 + x2*0.0 + x3*0.0 + x4*0.0 + x5*0.0 + x6*27.9 + x7*73.0 + x8*230.9 + x9*107.3 + x10*0.0 + x11*0.0 + x12*0.0 + x13*0.0 + x14*0.0 + x15*0.0 + x16*0.0 + x17*0.0 + x18*0.0 + x19*0.0 + x20*0.0 + x21*13.7 + x22*63.7 + x23*29.5 + x24*7.2 + x25*24.3 + x26*9.6 + x27*142.1 + x28*10.5 + x29*41.0 >= 420.0
... x0*0.0 + x1*0.0 + x2*0.0 + x3*0.0 + x4*0.0 + x5*0.0 + x6*27.2 + x7*72.9 + x8*88.5 + x9*107.3 + x10*0.0 + x11*0.0 + x12*0.0 + x13*0.0 + x14*0.0 + x15*0.0 + x16*0.0 + x17*0.0 + x18*0.0 + x19*0.0 + x20*0.0 + x21*13.7 + x22*63.7 + x23*29.5 + x24*7.2 + x25*23.6 + x26*9.6 + x27*142.1 + x28*10.3 + x29*37.0 >= 420.0
... """
>>> eqns = ms.simplify(equation, all=False, cycle=True)
>>> print(eqns)
x4 >= -0.31304347826087*x0 - 0.0826086956521739*x1 - 0.426086956521739*x10 - 0.473913043478261*x11 - 1.17826086956522*x12 - 0.652173913043478*x13 - 3.42173913043478*x14 - 0.252173913043478*x15 - 0.147826086956522*x16 - 0.0782608695652174*x17 - 0.147826086956522*x18 - 0.0434782608695652*x19 - 1.56086956521739*x2 - 0.126086956521739*x20 - 0.178260869565217*x3 - 0.834782608695652*x5 + 1.26086956521739
x7 >= -0.187928669410151*x21 - 0.873799725651577*x22 - 0.404663923182442*x23 - 0.0987654320987654*x24 - 0.323731138545953*x25 - 0.131687242798354*x26 - 1.94924554183813*x27 - 0.141289437585734*x28 - 0.507544581618656*x29 - 0.373113854595336*x6 - 1.21399176954733*x8 - 1.4718792866941*x9 + 5.76131687242798
x0 >= -0.263888888888889*x1 - 1.40277777777778*x10 - 1.5*x11 - 1.56944444444444*x12 - 2.05555555555556*x13 - 10.9166666666667*x14 - 0.805555555555556*x15 - 0.472222222222222*x16 - 0.25*x17 - 0.472222222222222*x18 - 0.138888888888889*x19 - 4.95833333333333*x2 - 0.402777777777778*x20 - 0.569444444444444*x3 - 3.19444444444444*x4 - 2.66666666666667*x5 + 3.75
x6 >= -0.491039426523298*x21 - 2.2831541218638*x22 - 1.0573476702509*x23 - 0.258064516129032*x24 - 0.870967741935484*x25 - 0.344086021505376*x26 - 5.09318996415771*x27 - 0.376344086021505*x28 - 1.46953405017921*x29 - 2.61648745519713*x7 - 8.27598566308244*x8 - 3.84587813620072*x9 + 15.0537634408602
x3 >= -1.75609756097561*x0 - 0.463414634146341*x1 - 2.39024390243902*x10 - 2.65853658536585*x11 - 6.60975609756098*x12 - 3.65853658536585*x13 - 19.1951219512195*x14 - 1.41463414634146*x15 - 0.829268292682927*x16 - 0.439024390243902*x17 - 0.829268292682927*x18 - 0.24390243902439*x19 - 8.75609756097561*x2 - 0.707317073170732*x20 - 5.60975609756098*x4 - 4.68292682926829*x5 + 7.07317073170732
>>> 
>>> constrain = ms.generate_constraint(ms.generate_solvers(eqns))  
>>>
>>> constrain(list(range(-29,1)))
[-29, -28, -27, -26, 187.46956521739128, -24, 84.56076719225553, 85.54595336076824, -21, -20, -19, -18, -17, -16, -15, -14, -13, -12, -11, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0]
>>> 

You may also want to look at and and or, which when used with the join keyword in generate_constraint, can be useful for modifying how the individual constraints work together. Also, if you have specific parameters you'd prefer are solved for, you can give them with the target keyword.

Anyway, the above should generate a constraint, useful within mystic's optimizers.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55925571/issues-regarding-constraints-setting-via-mystic-package

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!