问题
Little in the specman manual would indicate that one can determine on the fly whether a specific variable has been created. (not asking about testing for array index or hash members, which can be done via exists() )
I only noticed that discussion of struct name/path resolution does say that attempting a 'keep' on a struct field that does not exist within the path resolved will result in an error and _must_be_ commented out...
My work involves simulating a model constantly updated by multiple e-code developers, and test benches lose backwards compatibility whenever someone simply creates a new variable to further specify model & TCM build parameters.
回答1:
You can do this with the reflection interface. Look up "rf_manager" in the docs. Not everything is documented, however...
Here, I'm testing for the existence of field baz
:
struct foo {
bar : int;
};
struct baz {
};
extend sys {
run() is also {
var f : foo = new;
var rf_f : rf_struct = rf_manager.get_exact_subtype_of_instance(f);
var f_bar_field : rf_field = rf_f.get_field("bar");
if f_bar_field != NULL {
message(NONE,"struct 'foo' has a field called 'bar'");
} else {
message(NONE,"struct 'foo' doesn't have a field called 'bar'");
};
var b : baz = new;
var rf_b : rf_struct = rf_manager.get_exact_subtype_of_instance(b);
var b_bar_field : rf_field = rf_b.get_field("bar");
if b_bar_field != NULL {
message(NONE,"struct 'baz' has a field called 'bar'");
} else {
message(NONE,"struct 'baz' doesn't have a field called 'bar'");
};
};
};
This yields
[...]
Starting the test ...
Running the test ...
[0] sys-@0: struct 'foo' has a field called 'bar'
[0] sys-@0: struct 'baz' doesn't have a field called 'bar'
If you need to iterate over the fields, do :
rf_manager.get_exact_subtype_of_instance(whatever).get_declared_fields()
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4963294/in-specman-how-to-test-for-the-existence-of-a-variable-or-struct-field