问题
Is it perfectly ok (= well defined behaviour according to the standard) to call :
mystream.read(buffer, 0);
or
mystream.write(buffer, 0);
(and of course nothing will be read or written). I would like to know if I have to test if the provided size is null before calling one of these two functions.
回答1:
Yes, the behavior is well-defined: both functions will go through the motions for unformatted input/output functions (constructing the sentry, setting failbit if eofbit is set, flushing the tied stream if necessary), and then they will get to this clause:
§27.7.2.3[istream.unformatted]/30
Characters are extracted and stored until either of the following occurs:
— n characters are stored;
§27.7.3.7[ostream.unformatted]/5
Characters are inserted until either of the following occurs
— n characters are inserted;
"zero characters are stored/inserted" is true before anything is stored or extracted.
Looking at actual implementations, I see for (; gcount < n; ++gcount)
in libc++ or sgetn(buffer, n);
in stdlibc++ which has the equivalent loop
回答2:
Another extraction from 27.7.2.3 Unformatted input functions/1
gives us a clue that zero-size input buffers are valid case:
unformatted input functions taking a character array of non-zero size as an argument shall also store a null character (using charT()) in the first location of the array.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13014192/stdifstreamread-or-stdofstreamwrite-with-a-zero-parameter