问题
I've got a program which works in g++ and clang, using a nested initializer_list. In Visual C++, the 1D case works, but a 2D nested initializer_list does not. Is there a trick to make Visual C++ work, or is this maybe a bug in their implementation?
Here's my example code. It works in Visual C++ 2013 if I remove the annotated line.
#include <iostream>
#include <initializer_list>
using namespace std;
template<class T>
void print(T val) {
cout << val;
}
template<class T>
void print(initializer_list<T> lst) {
bool first = true;
cout << "[";
for (auto i : lst) {
if (!first) cout << ", ";
print(i);
first = false;
}
cout << "]";
}
template<class T>
void print(initializer_list<initializer_list<T>> lst) {
bool first = true;
cout << "[";
for (auto i : lst) {
if (!first) cout << ", ";
print(i);
first = false;
}
cout << "]";
}
int main()
{
print({1, 2, 3});
cout << endl;
// Without this line, Visual C++ 2013 is happy
print({{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}, {6}});
}
回答1:
template<class T>
std::initializer_list<T> list( std::initializer_list<T>&& l ) { return std::move(l); }
or something similar may at least give you the workaround:
print( { list({1,2}), list({3,2,1}) } );
the syntax can be messed around with (l*{2,1}
) in a few ways as well.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23965565/how-to-do-nested-initializer-lists-in-visual-c-2013