问题
C++17's aggregate initialization for base class is awesome, but it is verbose when the base is only there to provide some functions (so no data members).
Here is minimal example:
#include <cstddef>
struct base_pod
{
// functions like friend compare operator
};
template<typename T, std::size_t N>
struct der_pod : public base_pod
{
T k[N];
};
int main()
{
der_pod<int, 2> dp {{}, {3, 3} };
}
As the example above shows, I have to provide empty {}
, otherwise compile error will occur. live demo. If I omit it:
prog.cc:15:28: error: initializer for aggregate with no elements requires explicit braces
der_pod<int, 2> dp{3, 3};
^
prog.cc:15:31: warning: suggest braces around initialization of subobject [-Wmissing-braces]
der_pod<int, 2> dp{3, 3};
^
{}
1 warning and 1 error generated.
Any workaround or pre-C++17 way?
回答1:
You can still provide constructor, for example:
template <typename T, std::size_t N> using always_t = T;
struct base_pod
{
// functions like friend compare operator
};
template<typename T, typename Seq> struct der_pod_impl;
template<typename T, std::size_t ... Is>
struct der_pod_impl<T, std::index_sequence<Is...>> : base_pod
{
der_pod_impl(always_t<T, Is>... args) : k{args...} {}
T k[sizeof...(Is)];
};
template<typename T, std::size_t N>
using der_pod = der_pod_impl<T, std::make_index_sequence<N>>;
Demo
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55592478/how-to-avoid-when-using-aggregate-initialization-with-empty-base-class