I am writing a constructor in JavaScript that has the following properties:
function WhizBang() {
var promise;
this.publicMethod_One = function publicMethod_One() { ... };
this.publicMethod_Two = function publicMethod_Two() { ... };
promise = asyncInit();
}
So, calling new WhizBang()
will start the asyncInit()
process. What isn't obvious from the code above is that none of the public methods in the interface should run until this call to asyncInit()
has closed.
So, the definition of publicMethod_One()
might look something like this:
function publicMethod_One() {
promise
.then( doStuff )
.catch( reportInitFailure )
;
function doStuff() { ... }
function reportInitFailure() { ... }
}
Some of the things that happen in doStuff()
are asynchronous; some of them aren't.
So, if an end user of my class did something like this:
function main() {
var whizBang = new WhizBang();
whizBang
.publicMethod_One()
.publicMethod_Two()
;
}
The call to publicMethod_One()
musn't be made until asyncInit()
has closed. And the call to publicMethod_Two()
musn't be made until both asyncInit()
and publicMethod_One()
have closed.
How can I define my class methods so that they are chainable?
What I think I need to do is define a class whose public methods are all equivalent to calling then()
on a promise, followed by class specific, implementation stuff.
Internets, halp!
( Bonus points for using the Bluebird Promise Library in your answer. )
What you have now
What you have now is actually pretty nice. Since you're caching the result of asyncInit
in a promise and everyone waits for the same promise - it's impossible for any of the code in those functions to run before the promise has finished.
function publicMethod_One() {
promise // the fact you're starting with `promise.` means it'll wait
.then( doStuff )
.catch( reportInitFailure );
}
So rather than forcing people to wait in order to use publicMethod_One
they already can call it right away and the methods like doStuff
will only execute the promise has resolved.
A fluid interface
Well, like you noticed your code has a major issue, there is no way for a given method to know when to run or a way to sequence methods - you can solve this in two ways:
- Create a fluid interface that returns
this
on every action and queues the promise. - Return the promise from each async call.
Let's look at the two approaches:
Fluid interface
This means that all your methods return the instance, they must also queue so things don't happen 'at once'. We can accomplish this by modifying promise
on each call:
function publicMethod_One() {
promise = promise // note we're changing it
.then( doStuff )
.catch( reportInitFailure );
return this; // and returning `this`
}
You might also want to expose a .ready
method that returns the current promise so the sequence of operations can be waited for from the outside:
function ready(){
return this.promise;
}
This can enable things like:
var ready = new WhizBang().publicMethod_One().publicMethod_One().ready();
ready.then(function(){
// whizbang finished all operations
}); // can also add error handler
Returning thenables
In my opinion this is the simpler approach, all your methods return the promise they create so they can individually be waited for:
function publicMethod_One() {
return promise // note we're returning and not changing it
.then( doStuff )
.catch( reportInitFailure );
}
This is nice because the async operation is exposed outside.
Chaining is possible since you're using bluebird with .bind
as such:
var whiz = new WhizBang();
var res = Promise.bind(whiz).then(whiz.publicMethod_one)
.then(whiz.publicMethod_one);
res.then(function(){
// all actions completed, can also use return values easier.
});
But the advantage is it easier to reason about from the outside - for this reason I prefer this approach personally. Personally I always prefer to return
meaningful data than to change internal state.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28375619/chainable-promise-based-class-interfaces-in-javascript