问题
I am implementing PWA into my project, I have setted up the serviceworker.js, and I am using workbox.js for cache routing and strategies.
1- I add the offline page to cache on install event, when a user first visit the site:
/**
* Add on install
*/
self.addEventListener('install', (event) => {
const urls = ['/offline/'];
const cacheName = workbox.core.cacheNames.runtime;
event.waitUntil(caches.open(cacheName).then((cache) => cache.addAll(urls)))
});
2- Catch & cache pages with a specific regex, like these:
https://website.com/posts/the-first-post
https://website.com/posts/
https://website.com/articles/
workbox.routing.registerRoute(
new RegExp('/posts|/articles'),
workbox.strategies.staleWhileRevalidate({
cacheName: 'pages-cache'
})
);
3- Catch errors and display the offline page, when there's no internet connection.
/**
* Handling Offline Page fallback
*/
this.addEventListener('fetch', event => {
if (event.request.mode === 'navigate' || (event.request.method === 'GET' && event.request.headers.get('accept').includes('text/html'))) {
event.respondWith(
fetch(event.request.url).catch(error => {
// Return the offline page
return caches.match('/offline/');
})
);
}
else{
// Respond with everything else if we can
event.respondWith(caches.match(event.request)
.then(function (response) {
return response || fetch(event.request);
})
);
}
});
Now this is working for me so far if I visit for example: https://website.com/contact-us/ but if I visit any url within the scope I defined earlier for "pages-cache" like https://website.com/articles/231/ this would not return the /offline page since it's not in the user cache, and I would get a regular browser error.
There's an issue in how errors are handled, when there's a specific caching route by workbox.
Is this the best method to apply for offline fallback? how can I catch errors from these paths: '/articles' & '/posts' and display an offline page?
Please refer as well to this answer where there's a different approach to applying the fallack with workbox, I tried it as well same results. Not sure which is the accurate approach for this.
回答1:
I found a way to do it right with workbox. For each route I would add a fallback method like this:
const offlinePage = '/offline/';
/**
* Pages to cache
*/
workbox.routing.registerRoute(/\/posts.|\/articles/,
async ({event}) => {
try {
return await workbox.strategies.staleWhileRevalidate({
cacheName: 'cache-pages'
}).handle({event});
} catch (error) {
return caches.match(offlinePage);
}
}
);
In case of using network first strategy this is the method:
/**
* Pages to cache (networkFirst)
*/
var networkFirst = workbox.strategies.networkFirst({
cacheName: 'cache-pages'
});
const customHandler = async (args) => {
try {
const response = await networkFirst.handle(args);
return response || await caches.match(offlinePage);
} catch (error) {
return await caches.match(offlinePage);
}
};
workbox.routing.registerRoute(
/\/posts.|\/articles/,
customHandler
);
More details at workbox documentation here: Provide a fallback response to a route
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53503761/whats-the-right-way-to-implement-offline-fallback-with-workbox