Implementing ICollectionViewLiveShaping

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-03 12:43:06

问题


How is ICollectionViewLiveShaping implemented for the purpose of filtering? Is it something like:

public ICollectionView WorkersEmployed { get; set; }

WorkersEmployed = new CollectionViewSource { Source = GameContainer.Game.Workers }.View;

I'm not using GetDefaultView because I need multiple instances of filters on this collection. If it matters, GameContainer.Game.Workers is an ObservableCollection.

ApplyFilter(WorkersEmployed);

private void ApplyFilter(ICollectionView collectionView)
{
    collectionView.Filter = IsWorkerEmployed;
}

public bool IsWorkerEmployed(object item)
{
    Worker w = item as Worker;
    return w.EmployerID == this.ID;
}

This all works, but of course it must be manually refreshed, which is why I'm trying to use ICollectionViewLiveShaping. How does live filtering working?

Update: It appears that the only way to add a property to ICollectionViewLiveShaping's LiveFilteringProperties collection is via a string. Given that limitation, is it even possible to filter by properties in another class (Workers' EmployerID in this case)?

Is what I'm trying to do in this situation is even a viable option?


回答1:


All you need to do is add a property in LiveFilteringProperties for which you want the filter to call on property change and set IsLiveFiltering to true for your collection to enable live filtering.

Make sure PropertyChanged event gets raised whenever EmployerID property changes i.e. your Worker class should implement INotifyPropertyChangedEvent.

This will work then -

public ICollectionViewLiveShaping WorkersEmployed { get; set; }

ICollectionView workersCV = new CollectionViewSource
                         { Source = GameContainer.Game.Workers }.View;

ApplyFilter(workersCV);

WorkersEmployed = workersCV as ICollectionViewLiveShaping;
if (WorkersEmployed.CanChangeLiveFiltering)
{
    WorkersEmployed.LiveFilteringProperties.Add("EmployerID");
    WorkersEmployed.IsLiveFiltering = true;
}



回答2:


We are using WPF + MVVM + Visual Studio 2017.

We want to convert this to add live filtering:

public ObservableCollection<RowViewModel> Rows { get; set; }

The method below has two key advantages:

  • It's designed to work efficiently with the WPF runtime to minimise on-screen rendering using bulk updates.
  • So it's fast.
  • And because the boilerplate code is listed below, it's easier to follow compared to any other docs you will find on the web.

Please let me know if this worked for you, any issues and I'll update the instructions to make easier.

And the steps:

Step 1: Non-notifying Collection Wrapper

Create a special ObservableCollection that does not fire update events. This is a one-off. We want to fire the update bulk update event ourselves, which is faster.

public class NonNotifyingObservableCollection<T> : ObservableCollection<T>
{
    protected override void OnCollectionChanged(NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e) { /* Do nothing */ }
}

Step 2: Convert to NonNotifyingObservableCollection

Convert to a private variable which uses this new collection.

private NonNotifyingObservableCollection<RowViewModel> rows;
// ... and in constructor
rows = new NonNotifyingObservableCollection<RowViewModel>();

Step 3: Add Wrapper

Add these variables:

private ICollectionView rowsView;
public ICollectionViewLiveShaping RowsLiveView { get; set; }

And in the Initialise() call after the ViewModel is constructed (or perhaps in the constructor):

// Call on the dispatcher.
dispatcher.InvokeAsync(() =>
{
    this.rowsView = CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(this.rows);
    this.rowsView.Filter = o =>
        {
            // This condition must be true for the row to be visible on the grid.
            return ((RowViewModel)o).IsVisible == true;
        };
    this.RowsLiveView = (ICollectionViewLiveShaping)this.rowsView;
    this.RowsLiveView.IsLiveFiltering = true;
    // For completeness. Changing these properties fires a change notification (although
    // we bypass this and manually call a bulk update using Refresh() for speed).
    this.RowsLiveView.LiveFilteringProperties.Add("IsVisible");
});

Step 4: Add items

Now we add items to the backing collection, then call .Refresh() to refresh the view:

this.rowsView.Add(new RowViewModel( /* Set properties here. */ ));

We then bind the grid to RowsLiveView, (instead of binding to Rows in the original code).

Step 5: Update live filtering

Now we can update the IsVisible property, then call .Refresh() to redraw the grid.

rows[0].IsVisible=false;
this.rowsView.Refresh(); // Hides the first row.

Update

Update: This answer could be simplified. The whole point of ICollectionViewLiveShaping is to autorefresh without the need to call .Refresh(). Given that we have a NonNotifyingObservableCollection and we are manually controlling everything with a .Refresh(), could remove public ICollectionViewLiveShaping RowsLiveView { get; set; } and, directly to RowsView (make it a property with { get; set; }, and use normal ObservableCollection<>. In other words - ICollectionViewLiveShaping is great for a small amount of rows (e.g. <100), but for anything more, ICollectionView in combination with a bulk update and a manual Refresh() is better from a speed point of view.




回答3:


I experimented with this and it looks like it is not designed for what you (and me) want: Automatic filtering when you change filtering conditions. It filters automatically when some properties of DataGrid's item source changes, but not when filter conditions change - you must call ICollectionViewSource.Refresh manually.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17865202/implementing-icollectionviewliveshaping

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!