What is the difference between FragmentPagerAdapter and FragmentStatePagerAdapter?

问题

What is the difference between FragmentPagerAdapter and FragmentStatePagerAdapter?

About FragmentPagerAdapter Google\'s guide says:

This version of the pager is best for use when there are a handful of typically more static fragments to be paged through, such as a set of tabs. The fragment of each page the user visits will be kept in memory, though its view hierarchy may be destroyed when not visible. This can result in using a significant amount of memory since fragment instances can hold on to an arbitrary amount of state. For larger sets of pages, consider FragmentStatePagerAdapter.

And about FragmentStatePagerAdapter:

This version of the pager is more useful when there are a large number of pages, working more like a list view. When pages are not visible to the user, their entire fragment may be destroyed, only keeping the saved state of that fragment. This allows the pager to hold on to much less memory associated with each visited page as compared to FragmentPagerAdapter at the cost of potentially more overhead when switching between pages.

So I have just 3 fragments. But all of them are separate modules with a large amount of data.

Fragment1 handles some data (which users enter) and passes it via activity into Fragment2, which is just a simple ListFragment. Fragment3 is also a ListFragment.

So my questions are: Which adapter should I use? FragmentPagerAdapter or FragmentStatePagerAdapter?

回答1:

Like the docs say, think about it this way. If you were to do an application like a book reader, you will not want to load all the fragments into memory at once. You would like to load and destroy Fragments as the user reads. In this case you will use FragmentStatePagerAdapter. If you are just displaying 3 "tabs" that do not contain a lot of heavy data (like Bitmaps), then FragmentPagerAdapter might suit you well. Also, keep in mind that ViewPager by default will load 3 fragments into memory. The first Adapter you mention might destroy View hierarchy and re load it when needed, the second Adapter only saves the state of the Fragment and completely destroys it, if the user then comes back to that page, the state is retrieved.

回答2:

• FragmentPagerAdapter stores the whole fragment in memory, and could increase a memory overhead if a large amount of fragments are used in ViewPager.

• In contrary its sibling, FragmentStatePagerAdapter only stores the savedInstanceState of fragments, and destroys all the fragments when they lose focus.

• Therefore FragmentStatePagerAdapter should be used when we have to use dynamic fragments, like fragments with widgets, as their data could be stored in the savedInstanceState.Also it wont affect the performance even if there are large number of fragments.

• In contrary its sibling FragmentPagerAdapter should be used when we need to store the whole fragment in memory.

• When I say the whole fragment is kept in memory it means, its instances wont be destroyed and would create a memory overhead. Therefore it is advised to use FragmentPagerAdapter only when there are low number of fragments for ViewPager.

• It would be even better if the fragments are static, since they would not be having large amount of objects whose instances would be stored.

To be more detail,

FragmentStatePagerAdapter:

• with FragmentStatePagerAdapter,your unneeded fragment is destroyed.A transaction is committed to completely remove the fragment from your activity's FragmentManager.

• The state in FragmentStatePagerAdapter comes from the fact that it will save out your fragment's Bundle from savedInstanceState when it is destroyed.When the user navigates back,the new fragment will be restored using the fragment's state.

FragmentPagerAdapter:

• By comparision FragmentPagerAdapter does nothing of the kind.When the fragment is no longer needed.FragmentPagerAdapter calls detach(Fragment) on the transaction instead of remove(Fragment).

• This destroy's the fragment's view but leaves the fragment's instance alive in the FragmentManager.so the fragments created in the FragmentPagerAdapter are never destroyed.

回答3:

Here is a log lifecycle of each fragment in ViewPager which have 4 fragment and offscreenPageLimit = 1 (default value)

FragmentStatePagerAdapter

Go to Fragment1 (launch activity)

Fragment1: onCreateView
Fragment1: onStart
Fragment2: onCreateView
Fragment2: onStart

Go to Fragment2

Fragment3: onCreateView
Fragment3: onStart

Go to Fragment3

Fragment1: onStop
Fragment1: onDestroyView
Fragment1: onDestroy
Fragment1: onDetach
Fragment4: onCreateView
Fragment4: onStart

Go to Fragment4

Fragment2: onStop
Fragment2: onDestroyView
Fragment2: onDestroy

FragmentPagerAdapter

Go to Fragment1 (launch activity)

Fragment1: onCreateView
Fragment1: onStart
Fragment2: onCreateView
Fragment2: onStart

Go to Fragment2

Fragment3: onCreateView
Fragment3: onStart

Go to Fragment3

Fragment1: onStop
Fragment1: onDestroyView
Fragment4: onCreateView
Fragment4: onStart

Go to Fragment4

Fragment2: onStop
Fragment2: onDestroyView

Conclusion: FragmentStatePagerAdapter call onDestroy when the Fragment is overcome offscreenPageLimit while FragmentPagerAdapter not.

Note: I think we should use FragmentStatePagerAdapter for a ViewPager which have a lot of page because it will good for performance.

Example of offscreenPageLimit:

If we go to Fragment3, it will detroy Fragment1 (or Fragment5 if have) because offscreenPageLimit = 1. If we set offscreenPageLimit > 1 it will not destroy.
If in this example, we set offscreenPageLimit=4, there is no different between using FragmentStatePagerAdapter or FragmentPagerAdapter because Fragment never call onDestroyView and onDestroy when we change tab

Github demo here

回答4:

Something that is not explicitly said in the documentation or in the answers on this page (even though implied by @Naruto), is that FragmentPagerAdapter will not update the Fragments if the data in the Fragment changes because it keeps the Fragment in memory.

So even if you have a limited number of Fragments to display, if you want to be able to refresh your fragments (say for example you re-run the query to update the listView in the Fragment), you need to use FragmentStatePagerAdapter.

My whole point here is that the number of Fragments and whether or not they are similar is not always the key aspect to consider. Whether or not your fragments are dynamic is also key.

回答5:

FragmentPagerAdapter stores the previous data which is fetched from the adapter while FragmentStatePagerAdapter takes the new value from the adapter everytime it is executed.

回答6:

FragmentStatePagerAdapter = To accommodate a large number of fragments in ViewPager. As this adapter destroys the fragment when it is not visible to the user and only savedInstanceState of the fragment is kept for further use. This way a low amount of memory is used and a better performance is delivered in case of dynamic fragments.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18747975/what-is-the-difference-between-fragmentpageradapter-and-fragmentstatepageradapte