Python: try statement in a single line

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-11-26 15:48:49

问题


Is there a way in python to turn a try/except into a single line?

something like...

b = 'some variable'
a = c | b #try statement goes here

Where b is a declared variable and c is not... so c would throw an error and a would become b...


回答1:


There is no way to compress a try/except block onto a single line in Python.

Also, it is a bad thing not to know whether a variable exists in Python, like you would in some other dynamic languages. The safer way (and the prevailing style) is to set all variables to something. If they might not get set, set them to None first (or 0 or '' or something if it is more applicable.)


If you do assign all the names you are interested in first, you do have options.

  • The best option is an if statement.

    c = None
    b = [1, 2]
    
    if c is None:
        a = b
    else:
        a = c
    
  • The one-liner option is a conditional expression.

    c = None
    b = [1, 2]
    a = c if c is not None else b
    
  • Some people abuse the short-circuiting behavior of or to do this. This is error prone, so I never use it.

    c = None
    b = [1, 2]
    a = c or b
    

    Consider the following case:

    c = []
    b = [1, 2]
    a = c or b
    

    In this case, a probably should be [], but it is [1, 2] because [] is false in a boolean context. Because there are lots of values that can be false, I don't use the or trick. (This is the same problem people run into when they say if foo: when they mean if foo is not None:.)




回答2:


This is terribly hackish, but I've used it at the prompt when I wanted to write up a sequence of actions for debugging:

exec "try: some_problematic_thing()\nexcept: problem=sys.exc_info()"
print "The problem is %s" % problem[1]

For the most part, I'm not at all bothered by the no-single-line-try-except restriction, but when I'm just experimenting and I want readline to recall a whole chunk of code at once in the interactive interpreter so that I can adjust it somehow, this little trick comes in handy.

For the actual purpose you are trying to accomplish, you might try locals().get('c', b); ideally it would be better to use a real dictionary instead of the local context, or just assign c to None before running whatever may-or-may-not set it.




回答3:


In python3 you can use contextlib.suppress:

from contextlib import suppress

d = {}
with suppress(KeyError): d['foo']



回答4:


Another way is to define a context manager:

class trialContextManager:
    def __enter__(self): pass
    def __exit__(self, *args): return True
trial = trialContextManager()

Then use the with statement to ignore errors in one single line:

>>> with trial: a = 5      # will be executed normally
>>> with trial: a = 1 / 0  # will be not executed and no exception is raised
>>> print a
5

No exception will be raised in case of a runtime error. It's like a try: without the except:.




回答5:


parse_float = lambda x, y=exec("def f(s):\n try:\n  return float(s)\n except:  return None"): f(x)

There is always a solution.




回答6:


You can do it by accessing the namespace dict using vars(), locals(), or globals(), whichever is most appropriate for your situation.

>>> b = 'some variable'
>>> a = vars().get('c', b)



回答7:


The problem is that its actually a django model.objects.get query i am trying to test. the .get returns an error if no data is found... it doesn't return None (which annoys me)

Use something like this:

print("result:", try_or(lambda: model.objects.get(), '<n/a>'))

Where try_or is an utility function defined by you:

def try_or(fn, default):
    try:
        return fn()
    except:
        return default

Optionally you can restrict the accepted exception types to NameError, AttributeError, etc.




回答8:


You mentioned that you're using django. If it makes sense for what you're doing you might want to use:

my_instance, created = MyModel.objects.get_or_create()

created will be True or False. Maybe this will help you.




回答9:


Version of poke53280 answer with limited expected exceptions.

def try_or(func, default=None, expected_exc=(Exception,)):
    try:
        return func()
    except expected_exc:
        return default

and it could be used as

In [2]: try_or(lambda: 1/2, default=float('nan'))
Out[2]: 0.5

In [3]: try_or(lambda: 1/0, default=float('nan'), expected_exc=(ArithmeticError,))
Out[3]: nan

In [4]: try_or(lambda: "1"/0, default=float('nan'), expected_exc=(ArithmeticError,))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
[your traceback here]
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for /: 'str' and 'int'

In [5]: try_or(lambda: "1"/0, default=float('nan'), expected_exc=(ArithmeticError, TypeError))
Out[5]: nan



回答10:


if you need to actually manage exceptions:
(modified from poke53280's answer)

>>> def try_or(fn, exceptions: dict = {}):
    try:
        return fn()
    except Exception as ei:
        for e in ei.__class__.__mro__[:-1]:
            if e in exceptions: return exceptions[e]()
        else:
            raise


>>> def context():
    return 1 + None

>>> try_or( context, {TypeError: lambda: print('TypeError exception')} )
TypeError exception
>>> 

note that if the exception is not supported, it will raise as expected:

>>> try_or( context, {ValueError: lambda: print('ValueError exception')} )
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#57>", line 1, in <module>
    try_or( context, {ValueError: lambda: print('ValueError exception')} )
  File "<pyshell#38>", line 3, in try_or
    return fn()
  File "<pyshell#56>", line 2, in context
    return 1 + None
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'int' and 'NoneType'
>>> 

also if Exception is given, it will match anything below.
(BaseException is higher, so it will not match)

>>> try_or( context, {Exception: lambda: print('exception')} )
exception


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2524853/python-try-statement-in-a-single-line

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!