wadl

I managed to get a WADL by using the org.jboss.resteasy.wadl.ResteasyWadlServlet ( https://stackoverflow.com/a/41471710/2528609 ), but the WADL does not contain the Grammar. The representation nodes also do not contain an element attribute defining the response type. Given the following rest endpoint class import javax.ws.rs.GET; import javax.ws.rs.Path; import javax.ws.rs.Produces; import javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType; import javax.ws.rs.core.Response; @Path("user") public class UserEndpoint { @GET @Path("") @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) public UserResponse getUser() { UserResponse

I am trying to generate some Java class from XSD schema. I know exactly what I want to generate in Java, and I'm trying to write the corresponding XSD schema. I need to represent a java.util.HashMap (HashMap). I can't find how to specify in the XSD schema (or xjb binding file) that I want an HasMap in Java. It always generate a List.. here the code I want to generate @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlType(name = "ErrorMessage", propOrder = { "name", "details"}) public class ErrorMessage { @XmlElement(required = true) protected String name; @XmlElement(required = false) protected java

I have real difficulty finding commandline tool to convert WADL to java. No matter how much I try to google, follow blogs or java.net doc, there is no real download link. (links are broken or obsolete). What particular vendor, community group is supplying this tool ? Does free download link exist ? The generated code should be able to reconstruct POJOs from XML responses and survive inside Tomcat 7. Thank you Answer: (this works only after June 2011): Take Apache-CXF-2.4.1.zip (not any of the earlier versions) Extract it to root folder Take Apache-CXF-2.4.1.src.zip Search for folder named

I need to get WADL file for RESTful service. I know that in case using jersey it's available as http://localhost:8080/application.wadl . But I use RESTeasy. Can I do the same in my framework case? Latest versions: Quoting Chapter 49. RESTEasy WADL Support : Chapter 49. RESTEasy WADL Support 49.1. RESTEasy WADL Support for Servlet Container 49.2. RESTEasy WADL support for Sun JDK HTTP Server 49.3. RESTEasy WADL support for Netty Container 49.4. RESTEasy WADL Support for Undertow Container RESTEasy has its own support to generate WADL for its resources, and it supports several different

Is there a tool which takes a Java File what describes a REST service as a parameter and generates a wadl file out of that. I had the same problem: was using RESTeasy and wanted to find a way to generate the WADL automatically. Did some research and came to the solution below. 1. Add this to your pom.xml : <build> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>com.sun.jersey.contribs</groupId> <artifactId>maven-wadl-plugin</artifactId> <version>1.17</version> <executions> <execution> <id>generate</id> <goals> <goal>generate</goal> </goals> <phase>${javadoc-phase}</phase> </execution> </executions> <configuration

This question already has an answer here: RESTful Services - WSDL Equivalent 8 answers I am implementing a web service and I have implemented both a REST and SOAP version to see which suited my needs.I have decided to choose REST because of its simplicity and that I will probably be developing an iPhone app to consume it. My question is simple really, is it possible to create a WSDL or WADL for my REST service and is it necessary? Thanks With a good RESTful service, it's not necessary to generate WADL (let alone the much-less-well-fitting WSDL) for it because it will self-describe. By “self

To describe RESTful we can say that every resource has its own URI. Using HTTP GET, POST, PUT and DELETE, we can operate on these resources. All resources are representational. Whoever wants to use our resources can do so via a browser or REST client. That's the main idea of a RESTful architecture. This architecture allows services on the internet. So why does this architecture need WADL? What does WADL offer that standard HTTP does not? Why does WADL need to exist? Henryk Konsek The purpose of WADL is to define a contract . Contract specifies how one party can call another. When you create a

I've been researching WADL and am wondering why it isn't more widely adopted? With the rate at which REST usage seems to be growing, I'm surprised that more development efforts don't use it. Is there are fundamental flaw in its design, is it not a good match for the culture that typically surrounds RESTful web services, or is it something else entirely? LiorH I think the main reason why WADL doesn't gain popularity is that it might bring back to life all those problem we had with SOAP and WSDL. To me, the interoperability aspect is the single most important aspect of web-services. By following