vendor-prefix

Using variables in property names in LESS (dynamic properties / property name interpolation)

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2019-11-26 04:48:59
问题 I noticed that inuit.css, which was written in SASS, has a .vendor mix-in: @mixin vendor($property, $value...){ -webkit-#{$property}:$value; -moz-#{$property}:$value; -ms-#{$property}:$value; -o-#{$property}:$value; #{$property}:$value; } Is there a way to replicate this in LESS with some of the odd features like e() and @{ } ? 回答1: Update: LESS >= 1.6 As of version 1.6 (see changelog ) property name interpolation is implemented in LESS. So you don't need any magic anymore. (For older

Does .css() automatically add vendor prefixes?

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-26 04:26:00
问题 I have some code: $(\"#\" + this.id).css(\"border-radius\",this.radius + \"px\"); $(\"#\" + this.id).css(\"-moz-border-radius\",this.radius + \"px\"); $(\"#\" + this.id).css(\"-webkit-border-radius\",this.radius + \"px\"); I am trying to improve lines like this by using JSON to apply them (as shown in jQuery\'s docs) or by removing the vendor prefix versions completely. Does jQuery\'s .css() method automatically apply any required vendor prefixes when changing CSS properties on an element?

List of CSS vendor prefixes?

霸气de小男生 提交于 2019-11-26 04:07:33
问题 Besides the following list, are there other CSS vendor prefixes that are important for web development ? Are my definitions correct? Should I be more specific about mobile browsers (mobile Webkit, e.g.) -khtml- (Konqueror, really old Safari) -moz- (Firefox) -o- (Opera) -ms- (Internet Explorer) -webkit- (Safari, Chrome) Does this list (which also contains mso- , -wap- , and -atsc- ) add anything of value? 回答1: These are the ones I'm aware of: -ms- Microsoft mso- Microsoft Office -moz- Mozilla

How to validate vendor prefixes in CSS like -webkit- and -moz-?

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2019-11-26 03:44:48
问题 I use the webkit/mozilla border radius and box shadow CSS properties, but I want the CSS to validate (which it currently does not). Is there a way to get it to validate? http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ 回答1: No, they are browser specific properties, and not defined in the standard CSS specification. That being said, they correctly follow the rules for vendor specific extension of CSS. It's just not in the W3C official CSS specification. 回答2: Although the syntax for vendor extensions is