user-acceptance-testing

How detailed should a customer acceptance test be?

▼魔方 西西 提交于 2019-12-04 17:16:44
问题 Here is a test description, testing the "Create New Widget" use-case. Confirm that you can enter a new widget into the system. Here is another test description, testing the "Create New Widget" use-case. Bring up the application. Create a new widget by the name of "A-008", with the description being "Test Widget for Acceptance Test 3-45". Confirm that the widget is now visible in the leftmost widget tree view. Select another widget in the tree view, then select the widget "A-008" again.

How detailed should a customer acceptance test be?

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-12-03 10:19:38
Here is a test description, testing the "Create New Widget" use-case. Confirm that you can enter a new widget into the system. Here is another test description, testing the "Create New Widget" use-case. Bring up the application. Create a new widget by the name of "A-008", with the description being "Test Widget for Acceptance Test 3-45". Confirm that the widget is now visible in the leftmost widget tree view. Select another widget in the tree view, then select the widget "A-008" again. Confirm that the values in the widget display equal the values you entered. Delete widget "A-008" and close

Is it valid to have specflow features depending on other features?

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-02 07:24:15
问题 I want to write an acceptance test along the lines of given the first test has run when I do this new test then this new test passes This is because the first test will leave the data in a valid state to perform the next test Can I do this in Specflow? 回答1: yes you can do this in specflow, but with a slight caveat. this approach will not run one scenario, then run the other, it will run the first scenario on its own, then the dependent scenario will run the first scenario again followed by

Is it valid to have specflow features depending on other features?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-02 04:53:31
I want to write an acceptance test along the lines of given the first test has run when I do this new test then this new test passes This is because the first test will leave the data in a valid state to perform the next test Can I do this in Specflow? yes you can do this in specflow, but with a slight caveat. this approach will not run one scenario, then run the other, it will run the first scenario on its own, then the dependent scenario will run the first scenario again followed by the second scenario. The order of these may not be deterministic. We have avoided this issue by @ignore the