testcase

I tried writing the following TestCase for an NUnit test written in VB.net: <TestCase("FirstNode", "<node id=\"FirstNode\">")> Public Sub GetNode_GivenSomeNodeId_ReturnCorrectNode(ByVal nodeId as String, ByVal expectedXml as String) (Call the method under test and request the xmlNode with the provided id...) Assert.AreEqual(expectedXml, returnedXml) End Sub The xml-node passed as the second parameter to the testcase is not valid however, as this clearly is not the correct way to escape double quotes. I'm sure I can find a workaround in order to check that the method under test returns the

How do I persist changes made within the same object inheriting from TestCase in unitttest? from unittest import TestCase, main as unittest_main class TestSimpleFoo(TestCase): foo = 'bar' def setUp(self): pass def test_a(self): self.assertEqual(self.foo, 'bar') self.foo = 'can' def test_f(self): self.assertEqual(self.foo, 'can') if __name__ == '__main__': unittest_main() I.e.: I want those two tests above to pass As some comments have echoed, structuring your tests in this manner is probably a design flaw in the tests themselves and you should consider restructuring them. However, if you want

I read about Structuring Unit Tests with having a test class per class and an inner class per method. Figured that seemed like a handy way to organize the tests, so I tried it in our Java project. However, the tests in the inner classes doesn't seem to be picked up at all. I did it roughly like this: public class DogTests { public class BarkTests { @Test public void quietBark_IsAtLeastAudible() { } @Test public void loudBark_ScaresAveragePerson() { } } public class EatTests { @Test public void normalFood_IsEaten() { } @Test public void badFood_ThrowsFit() { } } } Does JUnit not support this,