staging

问题 so if I do a git status I get: bsg-integration> git status On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'. Changes not staged for commit: (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) (commit or discard the untracked or modified content in submodules) modified: bsg-services (untracked content) no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") I then tried using git add . and

问题 I would like to have all HTTP requests made to my production environment be also automatically made against my testing environment. E.g. if anything makes a request to http://production.site.example.com/api/users/12345 then I want the same request to also be made against http://staging.site.example.com/api/users/12345 by some internal entity that sees the first request. Is there an easy way to set this up in IIS without having to create a custom module or similar? If not, what is the best

问题 I would like to have all HTTP requests made to my production environment be also automatically made against my testing environment. E.g. if anything makes a request to http://production.site.example.com/api/users/12345 then I want the same request to also be made against http://staging.site.example.com/api/users/12345 by some internal entity that sees the first request. Is there an easy way to set this up in IIS without having to create a custom module or similar? If not, what is the best

问题 I have a cPanel hosting package, and the staging url is this format: https://cpanelserver.com/~cpaneluserid/. This does take me to my WordPress site. However, it takes me to the WordPress page "Oh no! No content is appearing for this page!". Obviously the /~cpaneluserid/ part of the staging url is not recognized by WordPress as a valid page name. If I try to tack on an interior page name like this: https://cpanelserver.com/~cpaneluserid/about-us/, I still get an "oh no" unrecognized page

问题 The Heroku documentation at https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/deploying-to-a-custom-rails-environment says I shouldn't use a staging.rb file to define my staging environment. It may be tempting to create another custom environment such as “staging” and create a config/environments/staging.rb and deploy to a Heroku app with RAILS_ENV=staging. This is not a good practice. Instead we recommend always running in production mode and modifying any behavior by setting your config vars. I think

问题 The Heroku documentation at https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/deploying-to-a-custom-rails-environment says I shouldn't use a staging.rb file to define my staging environment. It may be tempting to create another custom environment such as “staging” and create a config/environments/staging.rb and deploy to a Heroku app with RAILS_ENV=staging. This is not a good practice. Instead we recommend always running in production mode and modifying any behavior by setting your config vars. I think

问题 I am building a web application with Firebase. Currently I can say that I do have two stages - development, the firebase serve which runs the localhost and firebase deploy --only hosting which uploads the web application on Firebase hosting. Everything is fine with that, but I do not see this as a professional solution. The problem that I see is that, my local environment and the live web application share the same database. I did quite some research on the topic and I understood that there

问题 I want to set up a staging environment on Google App Engine and have found good guidance for this in the following question: How to set up a staging environment on Google App Engine The only unanswered question I have is how to handle Cron jobs in this case. Ideally I'll just have to change the version to deploy to production, however I fear that that would mean that all cron jobs also run on the staging version, or is this not the case? 回答1: If you're using a different version approach you

问题 I work for a company that does sites for the pharma industry and we often need to get legal approval before we push any changes live. So, I'd like to migrate a lot of our work to a CMS environment, specifically wordpress but we need the ability to have a staging environment. Is it possible to instead of publishing a page have it publish to a staging environment that someone can browse as with a link as a site. So basically have 2 sites, one staging one live? 回答1: Generally speaking the above

问题 I work for a company that does sites for the pharma industry and we often need to get legal approval before we push any changes live. So, I'd like to migrate a lot of our work to a CMS environment, specifically wordpress but we need the ability to have a staging environment. Is it possible to instead of publishing a page have it publish to a staging environment that someone can browse as with a link as a site. So basically have 2 sites, one staging one live? 回答1: Generally speaking the above