stack-overflow

问题 I need to fill 2-d array with 0s. But compiled program falls with this error. What's wrong? int main() { int vert[1001][1001]; int hor[1001][1001]; int dudiag[1416][1416]; int uddiag[1416][1416]; int n, k, m; int row, col; int i, j; int answer = 0; for(i = 0; i <= 1000; i++){ for(j = 0; j <= 1000; j++){ vert[i][j] = 0; hor[i][j] = 0; } } ... } When cycle is commented out, it works properly. 回答1: The problem is that you are trying to allocate too much memory in the automatic store (AKA "on the

问题 This is different to other questions regarding an error message in Node that reads RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded in that I know exactly why I'm getting this error message. It's happening because I'm recursing, recursing quite a lot in fact. Thanks. 回答1: From node --help : node --max-stack-size=val Update: as the comments indicate, even though the help text still lists the --max-stack-size option, in node v0.10.x you need to use --stack-size instead. node --stack-size=val 回答2:

问题 Here the piece of code : int main() { char buffer[64]; int check; ... As you can see, check is declared AFTER buffer , so in the stack, we must have check ABOVE buffer in the stack right? However, when I disassembly (x86) it with gdb, this is what I got : --> check at 0xbffff4f8 --> buffer at 0xbffff4b8 My question : is there a specific order in the stack for local variable? Also, I have to tell you that I tried the same thing on another computer (x86 too, same gcc compilation options, but

问题 I'm coming back to programming after having done none for several years, and created a Sudoku game to get my feet wet again. I've written a recursive function to brute-force a solution, and it will do so for simple board states, but runs into a stack overflow most of the time for more complicated board states. I know that this could be averted using loops or a more efficient algorithm, but since this is for the sake of learning I want to know how to allocate more memory to the stack

问题 I'm coming back to programming after having done none for several years, and created a Sudoku game to get my feet wet again. I've written a recursive function to brute-force a solution, and it will do so for simple board states, but runs into a stack overflow most of the time for more complicated board states. I know that this could be averted using loops or a more efficient algorithm, but since this is for the sake of learning I want to know how to allocate more memory to the stack

问题 I do not have access to the JVM settings since I am submitting code to be run elsewhere, so I can't follow the other Stack Overflow answers about extending stack size. Is there any way to do it from inside my Java file? The reason I want to do this (not really important): I am using recursion on a tree with 10^5 nodes. The average case is ok, but there is no guarantee on the shape of the tree. I am dealing with an edge case where the tree is just one long line. I get a StackOverflowError, but

问题 I do not have access to the JVM settings since I am submitting code to be run elsewhere, so I can't follow the other Stack Overflow answers about extending stack size. Is there any way to do it from inside my Java file? The reason I want to do this (not really important): I am using recursion on a tree with 10^5 nodes. The average case is ok, but there is no guarantee on the shape of the tree. I am dealing with an edge case where the tree is just one long line. I get a StackOverflowError, but

问题 I do not have access to the JVM settings since I am submitting code to be run elsewhere, so I can't follow the other Stack Overflow answers about extending stack size. Is there any way to do it from inside my Java file? The reason I want to do this (not really important): I am using recursion on a tree with 10^5 nodes. The average case is ok, but there is no guarantee on the shape of the tree. I am dealing with an edge case where the tree is just one long line. I get a StackOverflowError, but

问题 I do not have access to the JVM settings since I am submitting code to be run elsewhere, so I can't follow the other Stack Overflow answers about extending stack size. Is there any way to do it from inside my Java file? The reason I want to do this (not really important): I am using recursion on a tree with 10^5 nodes. The average case is ok, but there is no guarantee on the shape of the tree. I am dealing with an edge case where the tree is just one long line. I get a StackOverflowError, but

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61427720/debugging-a-program-that-is-opened-by-pwntools