sqltransaction

Getting timeout errors with SqlTransaction on same table

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2019-12-11 18:03:10
问题 public TransImport() { ConnString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["Connection"].ConnectionString; SqlConnection conn_new; SqlCommand command_serial_new; SqlConnection conn; SqlCommand command_serial; SqlTransaction InsertUpdateSerialNumbers; conn = new SqlConnection(ConnString); command_serial = conn.CreateCommand(); conn_new = new SqlConnection(ConnString); command_serial_new = conn_new.CreateCommand(); command_serial_new.CommandText = "SELECT 1 FROM YSL00 WHERE SERLNMBR = @slnr";

JDBC transaction, execution order of sql statements

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-12-11 14:01:59
问题 I have following JDBC code: Connection conn = connectUserDataSource(); // Setting auto commit to false to execute all queries as part of transaction conn.setAutoCommit(false); PreparedStatement deletePreparedStatement = null; PreparedStatement insertPreparedStatement = null; try { deletePreparedStatement = conn.prepareStatement(sqlDelete); deletePreparedStatement.setInt(1, someId); deletePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(); insertPreparedStatement = conn.prepareStatement(sqlInsert); for

Is this TRANSACTION being ROLLBACK(ed) for me?

为君一笑 提交于 2019-12-11 01:58:08
问题 If I cause an error by trying to create an existing table, the existing transaction appears to have already rolled back itself: private void CreateSomeThings() { SqlConnection SqlConn = new SqlConnection(ConnectionString); SqlConn.Open(); (new SqlCommand("BEGIN TRANSACTION", SqlConn)).ExecuteNonQuery(); try { (new SqlCommand("CREATE TABLE sometable ([some_id] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL)", SqlConn)).ExecuteNonQuery(); // Create the table again, but carry on by catching the exception try {

JDBC Transaction control in Sybase

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-12-08 13:40:36
Need help in JDBC transaction control mechanism in JAVA. Issue: There are certain stored procedures in our Sybase DB that needs to be run on Unchained mode. Since we are updating our data on two different databases (unfortunately, both Sybase) we need to be able to rollback all our previous transactions, if there is any failure. But running with Unchained Mode (Auto commit - on) is not helping us with the rollbacks as some of the SPs have already committed the transactions. Connection connection = getConnection(); PreparedStatement ps = null; try{ String sql = getQuery(); // SQL Chained Mode

How to check if Dotnet transaction is rolled back?

半世苍凉 提交于 2019-12-06 06:21:12
问题 How Can I check if a dotnet transaction is closed or not ? 回答1: using(TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.RequiresNew)){ try{ //Do something; scope.Complete(); //denotes the transaction completed successful. } catch(TransactionAbortedException ex) { //scope.Complete(); is never called, the transaction rolls back automatically. } catch(ApplicationException ex) { } } 回答2: Your title asks one thing and your question asks another. so, I am going with your title.

How to check if Dotnet transaction is rolled back?

对着背影说爱祢 提交于 2019-12-04 09:47:02
How Can I check if a dotnet transaction is closed or not ? using(TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.RequiresNew)){ try{ //Do something; scope.Complete(); //denotes the transaction completed successful. } catch(TransactionAbortedException ex) { //scope.Complete(); is never called, the transaction rolls back automatically. } catch(ApplicationException ex) { } } Your title asks one thing and your question asks another. so, I am going with your title. If you want to know if the transaction is rolled back or set to rollback only, you can check transaction

Child Parent Transactions roll back

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-02 08:57:50
问题 I have a scenario in which I have to process multiple .sQL files, every file contains 3-4 insert or Update queries, now when any query in a file fails I do rollback whole transaction means whole file we be rolled back , and all other files executed before that file will get committed, I want an option where user can rollback entire transaction means all queries in a file executed and all files executed before that particular file containing error, and if user wants to skip that particular

Child Parent Transactions roll back

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-02 07:23:45
I have a scenario in which I have to process multiple .sQL files, every file contains 3-4 insert or Update queries, now when any query in a file fails I do rollback whole transaction means whole file we be rolled back , and all other files executed before that file will get committed, I want an option where user can rollback entire transaction means all queries in a file executed and all files executed before that particular file containing error, and if user wants to skip that particular file with error we will just rollback single file which contains error all other files will get committed,

SqlTransaction after catch transaction connection is null

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-12-01 19:03:35
I have a loop where I call stored procedure with different parameter value. Next call cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); I use transaction to save all or rollback, and checkBox2 - save always. I found one problem and I can't find solution. After first problem when catch block is fired transaction object loses its connection. t.connection is null! Everything is good but transaction object is without connection at start it has! try { while (!sr.EndOfStream) { strLine.Remove(0, strLine.Length); //c = sr.ReadLine(); while (c != "-") { c = sr.ReadLine(); strLine.Append(c ); if (sr.EndOfStream) break; } /

Does SqlTransaction need to have Dispose called?

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-11-29 10:25:55
Do I need to call dispose in the finally block for SqlTransaction? Pretend the developer didnt use USING anywhere, and just try/catch. SqlTransaction sqlTrans = con.BeginTransaction(); try { //Do Work sqlTrans.Commit() } catch (Exception ex) { sqlTrans.Rollback(); } finally { sqlTrans.Dispose(); con.Dispose(); } Tim Schmelter Do I need to use try-finally or the using -statement to dispose the SqlTransaction ? It does not hurt to have it. This is true for every class implementing IDisposable , otherwise it would not implement this interface. But normally the garbage collector would deal with it