relative-url

问题 I seem to be finding that IE sometimes tries to load CSS images with relative URLs, relative to the page url rather than the CSS file url. Example... someone loads this url: https://www.main-events.com/event/234/my-awesome-show/onlineentry/step-four/do-something That has a CSS file: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/content/core/MainEvents.min.css" /> With this inside it: .fade-red { background: url("../../img/fade-red.png") repeat-x scroll 0 100% #9D0032; } I then get an

问题 We are migrating to git. We have a large number of modules that make up our products, some of them are shared between products. The product is represented by a "thin" super repository (ssh://server/product.git) that only contains submodules: [submodule "module1"] path=module1 url=ssh://server/product/module1.git [submodule "module2"] path=module2 url=ssh://server/product/module2.git ... I can clone the super repository and work with the submodules and commit them, and then commit the

问题 We are migrating to git. We have a large number of modules that make up our products, some of them are shared between products. The product is represented by a "thin" super repository (ssh://server/product.git) that only contains submodules: [submodule "module1"] path=module1 url=ssh://server/product/module1.git [submodule "module2"] path=module2 url=ssh://server/product/module2.git ... I can clone the super repository and work with the submodules and commit them, and then commit the

问题 I'm trying to get an Ajax call from a link in a master page. So I want to specify only the action relative to the current page/controller. i.e. $.ajax({ url: '/Save', type: "GET", // .. etc }); I want to call the "Save" action of whatever controller served the page. I thought this would work straight off, but it doesn't appear to. Is there an elegant solution? 回答1: If you got this straight into your view, you could do $.ajax({ url: '@Url.Action("Save")', type: "GET", // .. etc }); If not, and

问题 I've got a base URL and some relative URIs in that document I want to have the absolute path of. E.g. base = https://example.com/some/path.html?query=string and relative URIs in that document: index.html → https://example.com/some/index.html .. → https://example.com/ ../../../../abc → https://example.com/abc abc/.. → https://example.com/some/ //example.org/ → https://example.org/ ftp://example.net/ → ftp://example.net/ In Java you have the class URL accomplishing that: URL abs = new URL(new

问题 I am trying to display a website to a user, having downloaded it using php. This is the script I am using: <?php $url = 'http://stackoverflow.com/pagecalledjohn.php'; //Download page $site = file_get_contents($url); //Fix relative URLs $site = str_replace('src="','src="' . $url,$site); $site = str_replace('url(','url(' . $url,$site); //Display to user echo $site; ?> So far this script works a treat except for a few major problems with the str_replace function. The problem comes with relative

问题 It's been an oft-discussed question on StackOverflow what this means: <script src="//cdn.example.com/somewhere/something.js"></script> This gives the advantage that if you're accessing it over HTTPS, you get HTTPS automatically, instead of that scary "Insecure elements on this page" warning. But why use protocol-relative URLs at all? Why not simply use HTTPS always in CDN URLs? After all, an HTTP page has no reason to complain if you decide to load some parts of it over HTTPS. (This is more

问题 I am creating a website on localhost . I want to make all of link resources in my website to relative path ( I mean only internal resources). website is located in http://localhost/mywebsite I read this useful question Absolute vs relative URLs. I found differences between /images/example.png and images/example.png <a href="/images/example.png"> Link To Image</a> Above relative path should return ROOT_DOCUMENT/images/example.png because of / at first of url. As ROOT_DOCUMENT is something like

问题 I need some simple help with my htaccess file, thank you in advance. I have a number website URLs, such as: www.site.com/index.php?page_path=solutions-overview.html www.site.com/index.php?page_path=solutions-a.html I want to use the RewriteEngine to change the above links to the following respectively: www.site.com/solutions/overview www.site.com/solutions/a Below is the .htaccess code I am using: RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^solutions/overview index.php?page_path=solutions-overview.html

问题 I thought that both types would bring you to the root folder, but apparently, they work differently, once you do a URL rewrite. For instance, I normally use / which I know will bring you to the root folder and it does when a URL has been rewritten. When someone else tried to use ~/ after a URL has been rewritten, then the path fails to find the file. Why is that? 回答1: / will take you back to the root of your website. ~/ will take you to the home folder of your application on the website. If