recompile

As Maurico and codeka first stated, don't use the default InProc sessions if you don't want your sessions to be affected by website recompiles and application recycles. A list of what causes whole website recompile: By default, when any change is made to a top-level file in a Web site, the whole site is recompiled. Top-level files include the global.asax file and all files in the bin/ and App_Code/ folders. modifying web.config a configuration include file change, if the SectionInformation.RestartOnExternalChanges property is true <section name="MyAppSettings" type="System.Configuration

Is there a way to to recompile from an edited source code via homebrew? I did a change on the source user.hpp of Boost which I now want to recompile Boost with. I tried --build-from-source and --enable-bar but neither works, saying that it is already installed. The only way I can recompile is by reinstall but that simply overwrites the source code I changed. Any idea? First option Download the archive, edit the files, and zip the archive as homebrew does (same name and format). If you kept the original folder structure created by Homebrew, you can put the modified archive in ~/Library/Caches

Is it possible to translate an assembly language to LLVM IR, optimize it and then recompile it to a different architecture? How would you handle "push"es and "pop"s on the stack in the IR? This is the simplest objection I found, but I'm sure that there're tons like this. I'm planning to build a dynamic recompiler, and it seems that this would be an excellent solution, since LLVM would automatically optimize my code for the new architecture. Is all this possible with LLVM? Thanks Richard Pennington This is a similar question: Recompile a x86 code with LLVM to some faster one x86 The answer is

I have a program i frequently use that is made with .NET. This program has a small bug that is very annoying and the developer to the app is nowhere to be found. I have found the location of the problem in reflector and just want to add a single if-statement here and then recompile the program. What is the easiest way to do this? I have tried using the export-function in reflector but it doesn't seem to work perfectly. For example alot of using-directives are missing and enums that are cast back and forth to ints are also not exported properly. I believe i can fix this with some work but i'm

This is a very uninformed question, but: I would like to start using C++11. Can I continue to use my large collection of libraries which were compiled with my old gcc 4.2.1 compiler or do I need to recompile them all with a new compiler? I would think (or hope) the answer is no, but I am only a dabbler. So that I may have at least part of my ignorance removed, can you explain why in either case? Thanks Yes, you should. The weaker reason is not binary compatibility, the problem is about expectations. A C++11 enabled compiler will expect a number of features to be available (move constructors