raw-data

Is there any URL google has that contains the raw data for the file? using https://drive.google.com/file/d/FILE_ID just takes you to a 'share' section of the file... say I have a .js file on GDrive. If you go to their share link, they have a share page. Is there any link to get the raw javascript from the file, as to use in a <script src="google_link_or_whatever"> ? Bobby Fritze NOTE - THIS WAS THE SOLUTION BUT IT NO LONGER WORKS - SEE COMMENT BY @Bobby Fritze below No API's and no JS necessary. Confirmed now working on latest version of Drive. Great workaround for if your server doesn't use

I want to buy Samsung Gear S3 for development. I want to use raw data that Gear S3 has. I searched many sites, but I couldn't find how to get raw data from Gear S3 in Android using BLE. Any help please? The topic Seems vast. I haven't seen some example code to fetch data directly from hardware layer sensor of another device of another platform. I know You can transfer the data in application layer using common BLE protocol. In Tizen, you can chose your suitable platform Native (C/C++) or Web (js/HTML/CSS) You can start from checking out the Tizen Native Sensor Guide , It discusses how to fetch

I'm using Nokogiri (Ruby Xpath library) to grep contents on web pages. Then I found problems with some web pages, such as Ajax web pages, and that means when I view source code I won't be seeing the exact contents such as <table> , etc. How can I get the HTML code for the actual content? Don't use Nokogiri at all if you want the raw source of a web page. Just fetch the web page directly as a string, and then do not feed that to Nokogiri. For example: require 'open-uri' html = open('http://phrogz.net').read puts html.length #=> 8461 puts html #=> ...raw source of the page... If, on the other

I recently found out that the src attribute of an image allows you to put raw base 64 image data straight into it. Am i right in supposing this is technically more efficient than a separate image file as additional requests for the images don't have to be made? Or is the overhead so small that it's not worth it? Also, assuming i ended up doing this, what would be the best way to get that raw data? (out of, say, an image i whipped up in paint?) It depends on what you mean by "more efficient". If your measure is time, then it can be more efficient. The technique you're referring to is using a