pysftp

问题 I'm trying to fetch from SFTP with the following structure: main_dir/ dir1/ file1 dir2/ file2 I tried to achieve this with commands below: sftp.get_r(main_path + dirpath, local_path) or sftp.get_d(main_path + dirpath, local_path) The local path is like d:/grabbed_files/target_dir , and the remote is like /data/some_dir/target_dir . With get_r I am getting FileNotFound exception. With get_d I am getting empty dir (when target dir have files not dirs, it works fine). I'm totally sure that

问题 I'm trying to fetch from SFTP with the following structure: main_dir/ dir1/ file1 dir2/ file2 I tried to achieve this with commands below: sftp.get_r(main_path + dirpath, local_path) or sftp.get_d(main_path + dirpath, local_path) The local path is like d:/grabbed_files/target_dir , and the remote is like /data/some_dir/target_dir . With get_r I am getting FileNotFound exception. With get_d I am getting empty dir (when target dir have files not dirs, it works fine). I'm totally sure that

问题 When uploading 100 files of 100 bytes each with SFTP, it takes 17 seconds here ( after the connection is established, I don't even count the initial connection time). This means it's 17 seconds to transfer 10 KB only, i.e. 0.59 KB/sec! I know that sending SSH commands to open , write , close , etc. probably creates a big overhead, but still, is there a way to speed up the process when sending many small files with SFTP? Or a special mode in paramiko / pysftp to keep all the writes operations

问题 When uploading 100 files of 100 bytes each with SFTP, it takes 17 seconds here ( after the connection is established, I don't even count the initial connection time). This means it's 17 seconds to transfer 10 KB only, i.e. 0.59 KB/sec! I know that sending SSH commands to open , write , close , etc. probably creates a big overhead, but still, is there a way to speed up the process when sending many small files with SFTP? Or a special mode in paramiko / pysftp to keep all the writes operations

问题 When uploading 100 files of 100 bytes each with SFTP, it takes 17 seconds here ( after the connection is established, I don't even count the initial connection time). This means it's 17 seconds to transfer 10 KB only, i.e. 0.59 KB/sec! I know that sending SSH commands to open , write , close , etc. probably creates a big overhead, but still, is there a way to speed up the process when sending many small files with SFTP? Or a special mode in paramiko / pysftp to keep all the writes operations

问题 I have a script which I use to retrieve specific files via SFTP on a regular basis. On occasion, the script will error out with the following output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "ETL.py", line 304, in <module> get_all_files(startdate, enddate, "vma" + foldernumber + "/logs/", txtype[1] + single_date2 + ".log", txtype[2] + foldernumber + "\\", sftp) File "ETL.py", line 283, in get_all_files sftp.get(sftp_dir + filename, local_dir + filename) File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55155030/no-hostkey-for-found-in-pysftp-code-even-though-cnopts-hostkeys-is-set-to

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55155030/no-hostkey-for-found-in-pysftp-code-even-though-cnopts-hostkeys-is-set-to

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64438184/pysftp-throwing-paramiko-ssh-exception-sshexception-even-though-known-hosts-file

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64438184/pysftp-throwing-paramiko-ssh-exception-sshexception-even-though-known-hosts-file