public

I have pub key in xml format: <RSAKeyValue><Modulus>xF9y25EXh8n99sXtU/JAsYTwML6PB7gSCE8tWw8Www2KBfDqohQBL8FMs8jzsDQa7WwoEmiVJ1resEC9YXJGbwQyWgb9qgooC9oSnCB/TkRdBybwby0DKuZOzq+609OBGkwWpgnS4QVCBc6eW+10l3qE3/2hKdcSV+08iRYp7zs=</Modulus><Exponent>AQAB</Exponent></RSAKeyValue> So i try thms like this: from M2Crypto import RSA from xml.dom.minidom import parseString import base64 dom = parseString(pubKey) e = base64.b64decode(dom.getElementsByTagName('Exponent')[0].childNodes[0].data) n = base64.b64decode(dom.getElementsByTagName('Modulus')[0].childNodes[0].data) rsa = RSA.new_pub_key((e, n)) Got

For some reason, I can't access any files in the public dir. Not found error. I'm not putting the public part in the URL, obviously. View the Lovers source code repository on GitHub . Sweet. I fixed this. After reading about Sinatra Configurations , I added this line to my application class: set :root, Lovers.root That worked! 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4989711/how-to-deploy-a-modular-sinatra-app-to-heroku

We can write a java program with one non-public class containing a main method -- it'll compile and run just fine. Why do people make the main class public? Is there any benefit? There is no benefit of making the class public for the sake of it having a main method. That being said, there isn't really much of a reason not to either. Chances are the main class is either going to be very short with few, if any, substantial methods in it, or it's going to be baked into one of the core classes like class Server { public static void main(String[] args) { Server s = new Server(); s.start(); } //

I have a main class that has a thread pool, which is used by quite a few other classes for performing actions on a database. I currently have a getter method to get the pool which works fine but seems a bit clumsy. Are there any circumstances where it is acceptable to use a public field instead of getter/setter methods? Are there any circumstances where it is acceptable to use a public field instead of getter/setter methods? The main reason that public fields are bad are that they expose the implementation to the outside world. That leads to unwanted coupling; i.e. classes that are overly

I had a queue implemented as linked list in my multithreaded server. I want to access this queue from another class. Both classes are in the same package. I tried making this queue as public static and accessing it through getter, but without success Can somebody tell me what is the exact problem. This is my code: Queue Declaration: public static Queue<Request> q=new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Request>(); public static void setQ(Queue<Request> q) { Connection.q = q; } public static Queue<Request> getQ() { return q; } Accesing Queue: Queue<Request> queue=new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Request>(); queue

I have a class that has A LOT of public variables and I need to be able to get a list of them. Here's an example of my class: public class FeatList: MonoBehaviour { public static Feat Acrobatic = new Feat("Acrobatic", false, ""); public static Feat AgileManeuvers = new Feat("Agile Maneuvers", false, "" ); void Start(){}} Except there are about 100 more variables. Is there any possible way to get all these member variables in one manageable array? Or have I screwed myself over? If by "Variables" you mean class fields (like variables at the class level) you can use reflection to get access, like

I'm currently programming a Blackjack application in Java and it needs to be written in an MVC architecture. I have all my models, views and controllers fully coded and everything works perfectly. However, I'm wondering what the best way of attaching listeners to components is (e.g, a JButton). My current design declares all components in the view that need listeners as public final. It then passes the view to the controller. From there, the controller has full reign to access the components and add action listeners. Code example: public class View extends JFrame { public final JButton myBtn1