post-increment

Array increment operator in C

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-11-26 22:30:35
I don't understand the results of following code: #include <stdio.h> #include <conio.h> int main() { int a[4]={1, 3, 5, 6}; //suppose a is stored at location 2010 printf("%d\n", a + 2); printf("%d", a++); return 0; } Why does the second printf function produce following error? error: lvalue required as increment operand Grijesh Chauhan Part-1: Array names are constant (not modifiable lvalue), your can add value to array name but can't modify it. Expression a + 2 doesn't modify a itself but when you do a++ that is equivalent to a = a + 1 try to modify array name --lvalue error. The expression a

What is the difference between pre-increment and post-increment in the cycle (for/while)?

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-11-26 22:19:20
My interest is in the difference between for and while loops. I know that the post-increment value is used and then incremented and the operation returns a constant pre-increment. while (true) { //... i++; int j = i; } Here, will j contain the old i or the post-incremented i at the end of the loop? zennehoy Since the statement i++ ends at the ; in your example, it makes no difference whether you use pre- or post-increment. The difference arises when you utilize the result: int j = i++; // i will contain i_old + 1, j will contain the i_old. Vs: int j = ++i; // i and j will both contain i_old +

What is x after “x = x++”?

孤街浪徒 提交于 2019-11-26 21:59:48
问题 What happens (behind the curtains) when this is executed? int x = 7; x = x++; That is, when a variable is post incremented and assigned to itself in one statement? I compiled and executed this. x is still 7 even after the entire statement . In my book, it says that x is incremented! 回答1: x does get incremented. But you are assigning the old value of x back into itself. x = x++; x++ increments x and returns its old value. x = assigns the old value back to itself. So in the end, x gets assigned

Java: pre-,postfix operator precedences

我们两清 提交于 2019-11-26 21:32:53
问题 I have two similar questions about operator precedences in Java. First one: int X = 10; System.out.println(X++ * ++X * X++); //it prints 1440 According to Oracle tutorial: postfix (expr++, expr--) operators have higher precedence than prefix (++expr, --expr) So, I suppose that evaluation order: 1) first postfix operator: X++ 1.a) X++ "replaced" by 10 1.b) X incremented by one: 10+1=11 At this step it should look like: System.out.println(10 * ++X * X++), X = 11; 2) second POSTfix operator: X++

Pre- & Post Increment in C#

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-11-26 20:27:23
I am a little confused about how the C# compiler handles pre- and post increments and decrements. When I code the following: int x = 4; x = x++ + ++x; x will have the value 10 afterwards. I think this is because the pre-increment sets x to 5 , which makes it 5+5 which evaluates to 10 . Then the post-increment will update x to 6 , but this value will not be used because then 10 will be assigned to x . But when I code: int x = 4; x = x-- - --x; then x will be 2 afterwards. Can anyone explain why this is the case? Sebastian Piu x-- will be 4, but will be 3 at the moment of --x , so it will end

Post-increment within a self-assignment

心不动则不痛 提交于 2019-11-26 19:49:10
问题 I understand the differences between i++ and ++i, but I'm not quite sure why I'm getting the results below: static void Main(string[] args) { int c = 42; c = c++; Console.WriteLine(c); //Output: 42 } In the above code, as this is assigning the variable to itself and then incrementing the value, I would expect the result to be 43 . However, it is returning 42 . I get the same result when using c = c--; as well. I realise I could just simply use c++; and be done with it, but I'm more curious

++i or i++ in for loops ?? [duplicate]

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-11-26 18:52:37
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 9 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? Is there a reason some programmers write ++i in a normal for loop instead of writing i++ ? 回答1: For integers, there is no difference between pre- and post-increment. If i is an object of a non-trivial class, then ++i is generally preferred, because the object is modified and then evaluated, whereas i++ modifies after evaluation, so requires a copy to

Incrementor logic

你离开我真会死。 提交于 2019-11-26 18:52:22
I'm trying to get deeper with post and pre incrementors but am a bit stuck with the following expression : public static void main(String[] args) { int i = 0; i = i+=(++i + (i+=2 + --i) - ++i); // i = 0 + (++i + (i+=2 + --i) - ++i); // i = 0 + (1 + (3 + 2) - 1); // i = 0 + (6 - 1); System.out.println(i); // Prints 0 instead of 5 } I know I'm missing the logic somewhere but where? What I've tried : Going from left to right (though I know it is not recommended) Going from the insidest bracket and starting from there. Thanks for the help PS : The comments are the details of my calculus EDIT 1 I

Order of operations for pre-increment and post-increment in a function argument? [duplicate]

三世轮回 提交于 2019-11-26 17:48:30
This question already has an answer here: Why are these constructs using pre and post-increment undefined behavior? 14 answers I have some C code: main() { int a=1; void xyz(int,int); xyz(++a,a++); //which Unary Operator is executed first, ++a or a++? printf("%d",a); } void xyz(int x,int y) { printf("\n%d %d",x,y); } The function xyz has two parameters passed in, ++a and a++ . Can someone explain the sequence of operations to explain the result? The above code prints "3 13" or "2 23" depending on which compiler is used. Well, there are two things to consider with your example code: The order

What is more efficient, i++ or ++i? [duplicate]

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-11-26 16:28:09
Exact Duplicate : Is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in C++? Exact Duplicate : Difference between i++ and ++i in a loop? What is more efficient, i++ or ++i? I have only used this in Java and C/C++, but I am really asking for all languages that this is implemented in. In college I had a professor show us that ++i was more efficient, but it has been a couple of years, and I would like to get input from the Stack Overflow community. i++ : create a temporary copy of i increment i return the temporary copy ++i : increment i return i With optimizations on, it is quite possible