policy

问题 I am using a bucket policy that denies any non-SSL communications and UnEncryptedObjectUploads. { "Id": "Policy1361300844915", "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Sid": "DenyUnSecureCommunications", "Action": "s3:*", "Effect": "Deny", "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket", "Condition": { "Bool": { "aws:SecureTransport": false } }, "Principal": { "AWS": "*" } }, { "Sid": "DenyUnEncryptedObjectUploads", "Action": "s3:PutObject", "Effect": "Deny", "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*",

问题 I have to create a web application that deals with user's sensitive information. I need to immediately clear the browser's cache after user logs out since cached data would be vulnerable. Client's browser should be enforced to clear the Cache from server side. Also all cache policies must be exposed to the client from the server side. Is there any solution to this problem? 回答1: Set the response to expire immediately, and for good measure tell proxies, etc., not to cache: Expires: 0 Cache

问题 There is a subtle reason why it might not be good: Sometimes, the blame for breaking something really should be placed on the individual who wrote fragile code without automated tests, not the one who broke their code by making a should-be-unrelated change somewhere else. One imaginable example is when someone programs against an interface in a way that assumes behavior specific to the implementation du jour, but not guaranteed by existing contracts. Then someone else makes a change to the

问题 In Keycloak I see there is a CRUD API to create a resource (and scopes): http://${host}:${port}/auth/realms/${realm_name}/authz/protection/resource_set Create resource set description: POST /resource_set Read resource set description: GET /resource_set/{_id} Update resource set description: PUT /resource_set/{_id} Delete resource set description: DELETE /resource_set/{_id} But I don't see an API to CRUD Authorization Policies, Permissions. I tried to create policies via the protection

问题 Do you have a problem understanding S3 IAM Policies and Directives ? Can't quite wrap your head around their documentation ? I did. I had a situation where I had to lock out several IAM users from a particular folder, and several buckets, except one, and most of their solutions and example solutions were about as clear as mud as far as I was concerned. After scouring the web and not finding what I was looking for I came upon a resource (http://blogs.aws.amazon.com/security/post

问题 I'm developing an Android app, which I therefore endlessly build and install on my test device. Since a couple days I get with every build/install a question asking Google may regularly check installed apps for potentially harmfull behaviour. Learn more in Google Settings > Verify apps. I get the option to Accept or Decline. I've declined about a hundred times now, but it seems to be Googles policy to keep on asking until I get sick of the message and finally click Accept. But I don't want

问题 I've tried to get my Java Applet to read from my text file, but I do not have sufficient privaleges to read the file when i run the applet in my browser. I have tried to use policy files but I cannot seem to get them to work. I later tried System.setProperty("java.security.policy", "*filelocation*"); but i got this error java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.util.PropertyPermission java.security.policy write) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(Unknown

问题 Is it possible to install Bouncycastle provider programmaticly without modifying security policy file? 回答1: sure: java.security.Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider()); 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1286837/bouncycastle-install-provider-programmatically

问题 I have a bookmarklet which uses jQuery and parses some elements on the page. To use jQuery, i am creating a script tag(with src as the jQuery URL) dynamically and appending to the head tag. This works well for many sites. But, there are few sites like Facebook, for which the bookmarklet is not able to inject the external JS file into the dom.I came to know that this behaviour is because of the response header "Content Security Policy" which prohibits the inclusion of scripts from any other

问题 I'm trying these policy through console.aws.amazon.com on my buckets: { "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": [ "s3:ListBucket", "s3:GetBucketLocation", "s3:ListBucketMultipartUploads" ], "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::itnighq", "Condition": {} }, { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": [ "s3:AbortMultipartUpload", "s3:DeleteObject", "s3:DeleteObjectVersion", "s3:GetObject", "s3:GetObjectAcl", "s3:GetObjectVersion", "s3:GetObjectVersionAcl", "s3:PutObject", "s3:PutObjectAcl", "s3