partial-classes

Update from comment: I need to extend linq-to-sql classes by own parameters and dont want to touch any generated classes. Any better suggestes are welcome. But I also don't want to do all attributes assignments all time again if the linq-to-sql classes are changing. so if vstudio generates new attribute to a class i have my own extended attributes kept separate, and the new innerited from the class itself Original question: i'm not sure if it's possible. I have a class car and a class mycar extended from class car. Class mycar has also a string list. Only difference. How can i cast now any car

I have a generic abstract UserControl class, SensorControl , which I want all my sensor control panels to inherit from. The problem When attempting to design the EthernetSensorControl (one of my inherited UserControl forms, from within Visual Studio, the following error is displayed in the form designer: The designer could not be shown for this file because none of the classes within it can be designed. The designer inspected the following classes in the file: DeviceSensorControl --- The base class 'Engine.Sensors.SensorControl' could not be loaded. Ensure the assembly has been referenced and

I have a partial that is split over two namespaces. The problem is that if I have an interface implemented on one of the partials, it is not recognized on the counterpart partial class. For example, I would expect the below to return true for being recognized as ILastModified (C# fiddle at http://ideone.com/heLDn0 ): using System; using MyNamespace.One; public class Test { public static void Main() { var item = new Product(); Console.WriteLine(item is ILastModified); //RETURNS FALSE??! } } interface ILastModified { DateTime LastModified { get; set; } } namespace MyNamespace.One { public

Consider a class which implements a lot of interfaces, would it make sense to implement each interface in a separate file using partial class definitions? Would this be an abuse of the language feature or is it an idiom I'm unaware of? If your class has to implement many interfaces, that's a reasonable way of managing the source, yes. You can edit the project file to make several of them depend on one "main" class file, which makes the Solution Explorer easier to work with. You should ask yourself whether you shouldn't have several smaller classes each implementing a single interface though.

I used the xsd.exe tool to generate a class based on my xml schema. It created a public partial class with DebuggerStepThroughAttribute. Well, I created another partial class file for this class to write my custom code and want to be able to step-into this code I've written but it appears the debugger is applying the step-through attribute to my partial class as well. Is there an easy way for me to step-into my code without manually removing the attribute each time I re-generate the partial class? You can make the debugger ignore this attribute under Tools->Options->Debugger->General. Uncheck

So in my mvc project's Project.Repository I have [MetadataType(typeof(FalalaMetadata))] public partial class Falala { public string Name { get; set; } public string Age { get; set; } internal sealed class FalalaMetadata { [Required(ErrorMessage="Falala requires name.")] public string Name { get; set; } [Required(ErrorMessage = "Falala requires age.")] public string Age { get; set; } } } I use Falala as a model in my Project.Web.AccountControllers, and use a method to get violations. Validating worked when I had public class Falala { [Required] public string Name { get; set; } [Required

This is my service generated class: public partial class MyClass : object, System.Runtime.Serialization.IExtensibleDataObject, System.ComponentModel.INotifyPropertyChanged { } I'm using my own service. In MyClass I have overridden ToString() but I don't have it in my client. I want either to generate it or as MyClass is partial am I able to override ToString myself? I know that I can write in generated .cs file. What is the best way to do it and at all should I do it? If you are defining both the client and the service, you don't need to use the WSDL-generate classes. Move the shared objects