parallel-processing

Using Parallel Processing in C# to test a site's ability to withstand a DDOS

≯℡__Kan透↙ 提交于 2021-02-11 07:13:08
问题 I have a website and I am also exploring Parallel Processing in C# and I thought it would be a good idea to see if I could write my own DDOS test script to see how the site would handle a DDOS attack. However when I run it, there only seems to be 13 threads in use and they always return 200 status codes, never anything to suggest the response wasn't quick and accurate and when going to the site and refreshing at the same time as the script runs the site loads quickly. I know there are tools

Using Parallel Processing in C# to test a site's ability to withstand a DDOS

浪尽此生 提交于 2021-02-11 07:11:27
问题 I have a website and I am also exploring Parallel Processing in C# and I thought it would be a good idea to see if I could write my own DDOS test script to see how the site would handle a DDOS attack. However when I run it, there only seems to be 13 threads in use and they always return 200 status codes, never anything to suggest the response wasn't quick and accurate and when going to the site and refreshing at the same time as the script runs the site loads quickly. I know there are tools

Using Parallel Processing in C# to test a site's ability to withstand a DDOS

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2021-02-11 07:11:17
问题 I have a website and I am also exploring Parallel Processing in C# and I thought it would be a good idea to see if I could write my own DDOS test script to see how the site would handle a DDOS attack. However when I run it, there only seems to be 13 threads in use and they always return 200 status codes, never anything to suggest the response wasn't quick and accurate and when going to the site and refreshing at the same time as the script runs the site loads quickly. I know there are tools

Using Parallel Processing in C# to test a site's ability to withstand a DDOS

我们两清 提交于 2021-02-11 07:11:13
问题 I have a website and I am also exploring Parallel Processing in C# and I thought it would be a good idea to see if I could write my own DDOS test script to see how the site would handle a DDOS attack. However when I run it, there only seems to be 13 threads in use and they always return 200 status codes, never anything to suggest the response wasn't quick and accurate and when going to the site and refreshing at the same time as the script runs the site loads quickly. I know there are tools

parallel within parallel code

試著忘記壹切 提交于 2021-02-10 16:25:19
问题 Once I have divided the tasks to 4 independent tasks and make them run in parallel. Is it possible to further make each task run in parallel ? (says, each task, there are lots of for each loop - that could be implemented as parallel code) 回答1: You definitely could, but it doesn't guarantee thread safety. You have to take into account multiple factors though What's the size of your iterations (The more, the better) How many concurrent threads can your CPU handle The amount of cores in your

Python joblib performance

∥☆過路亽.° 提交于 2021-02-10 16:03:35
问题 I need to run an embarrassingly parallel for loop. After a quick search, I found package joblib for python. I did a simple test as posted on the package's website. Here is the test from math import sqrt from joblib import Parallel, delayed import multiprocessing %timeit [sqrt(i ** 2) for i in range(10)] result: 3.89 µs ± 38.9 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each) num_cores = multiprocessing.cpu_count() %timeit Parallel(n_jobs=num_cores)(delayed(sqrt)(i ** 2) for i in

Python joblib performance

寵の児 提交于 2021-02-10 16:01:40
问题 I need to run an embarrassingly parallel for loop. After a quick search, I found package joblib for python. I did a simple test as posted on the package's website. Here is the test from math import sqrt from joblib import Parallel, delayed import multiprocessing %timeit [sqrt(i ** 2) for i in range(10)] result: 3.89 µs ± 38.9 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each) num_cores = multiprocessing.cpu_count() %timeit Parallel(n_jobs=num_cores)(delayed(sqrt)(i ** 2) for i in

Why my parallel code using openMP atomic takes a longer time than serial code?

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2021-02-10 15:51:01
问题 The snippet of my serial code is shown below. Program main use omp_lib Implicit None Integer :: i, my_id Real(8) :: t0, t1, t2, t3, a = 0.0d0 !$ t0 = omp_get_wtime() Call CPU_time(t2) ! ------------------------------------------ ! Do i = 1, 100000000 a = a + Real(i) End Do ! ------------------------------------------ ! Call CPU_time(t3) !$ t1 = omp_get_wtime() ! ------------------------------------------ ! Write (*,*) "a = ", a Write (*,*) "The wall time is ", t1-t0, "s" Write (*,*) "The CPU

Joblib Parallel + Cython hanging forever

只愿长相守 提交于 2021-02-10 15:44:12
问题 I have a very weird problem while creating a Python extension with Cython that uses joblib.Parallel . The following code works as expected: from joblib import Parallel, delayed from math import sqrt print(Parallel(n_jobs=4)(delayed(sqrt)(x) for x in range(4))) The following code hangs forever: from joblib import Parallel, delayed def mult(x): return x*3 print(Parallel(n_jobs=4)(delayed(mult)(x) for x in range(4))) I have no clues why. I use the following setup.py : from distutils.core import

Joblib Parallel + Cython hanging forever

好久不见. 提交于 2021-02-10 15:41:32
问题 I have a very weird problem while creating a Python extension with Cython that uses joblib.Parallel . The following code works as expected: from joblib import Parallel, delayed from math import sqrt print(Parallel(n_jobs=4)(delayed(sqrt)(x) for x in range(4))) The following code hangs forever: from joblib import Parallel, delayed def mult(x): return x*3 print(Parallel(n_jobs=4)(delayed(mult)(x) for x in range(4))) I have no clues why. I use the following setup.py : from distutils.core import