obfuscation

问题 I recently bought a script from a guy that isn't replying anymore, and left me with the script obfuscated and not working. The thing is that everything works except the encoded part, which gives error. I've tried every website on google to un-obfuscate this, with no luck. How can I "decrypt" this part to make this script work? var _0x4091 = ['.r_popup', 'transform', 'translateY(', 'px)', 'scroll', 'html', 'click', 'opacity', 'display', 'block', 'target', 'parents', 'length', 'fadeOut',

问题 I tried using Dotpeek and ILSpy.Net to decompile (my own code), they failed. Do I need special obfuscation on distributed binaries of .Net Core 3 self-contained single executable ? <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk"> <PropertyGroup> <OutputType>Exe</OutputType> <TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.0</TargetFramework> <PublishTrimmed>true</PublishTrimmed> <PublishReadyToRun>true</PublishReadyToRun> <PublishSingleFile>true</PublishSingleFile> <RuntimeIdentifier>win-x64</RuntimeIdentifier> </PropertyGroup

问题 I tried using Dotpeek and ILSpy.Net to decompile (my own code), they failed. Do I need special obfuscation on distributed binaries of .Net Core 3 self-contained single executable ? <Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk"> <PropertyGroup> <OutputType>Exe</OutputType> <TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.0</TargetFramework> <PublishTrimmed>true</PublishTrimmed> <PublishReadyToRun>true</PublishReadyToRun> <PublishSingleFile>true</PublishSingleFile> <RuntimeIdentifier>win-x64</RuntimeIdentifier> </PropertyGroup

问题 I want to obfuscate Swift code using SwiftShield. I have integrated using Cocoapods. To run it, I am using below SwiftShield tool in terminal: swiftshield -automatic -project-root /app/MyApp -automatic-project-file /app/MyApp/MyApp.xcworkspace -automatic-project-scheme MyApp-AppStore Getting error: -bash: swiftshield: command not found I have copied swiftshield executable from pods to /usr/local/bin and tried the same command, but still getting below error dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath

问题 I created Android app with Xamarin Forms. For release I use option "Bundle assemblies into native code". My apk have size - 17 Mb, without this option 33 Mb. Do I need to use obfuscation for my libraries or my code is protected? I searched a lot - but I did not find an exact answer. 回答1: Bundle Assemblies into Native Code means: When this option is enabled, assemblies are bundled into a native shared library. This option keeps your code safe; it protects managed assemblies by embedding them

问题 So, I've tried de-obfuscating a script for a few hours now and it came to nothing. Any ideas on how to de-obfuscate this script? local a=function(tbl) local rtn='' for i = 1,#tbl do rtn = rtn..string.char(tbl[i]) end return tonumber(rtn) end rrr= a({50;33;48;51;57;55;22;51;49;49}) r = a({51;48;49;57;53;55;49;56;52;49}) rr = a({50;89;48;51;57;34;50;67;49;49}) wait() return function(ttt) local z=getfenv() pcall(function()z["\114\101\113\117\105\114\101"](rrr)(ttt)end) pcall(function()z["\114

问题 I'm getting deprecated warnings in regards to Proguard as well as R8 after upgrading my Android Studio to 3.6. Does that mean we shouldn't use obfuscation in our projects or is there another equivalent option we should consider while building in release mode? The option 'android.enableR8' is deprecated and should not be used anymore. It will be removed in a future version of the Android Gradle plugin, and will no longer allow you to disable R8. Affected Modules: etc 回答1: Does that mean we

问题 I'm getting deprecated warnings in regards to Proguard as well as R8 after upgrading my Android Studio to 3.6. Does that mean we shouldn't use obfuscation in our projects or is there another equivalent option we should consider while building in release mode? The option 'android.enableR8' is deprecated and should not be used anymore. It will be removed in a future version of the Android Gradle plugin, and will no longer allow you to disable R8. Affected Modules: etc 回答1: Does that mean we

问题 When I compile the code I am writing, then look at in a a JD Gui, methods show up with headers such as the following: public void growSurface(Random paramRandom, int paramInt1, int paramInt2){ I am compiling through a .bat file. Is there a way to specify that I don't want to obfuscate the code. 回答1: By default javac is not including debug information in generated class files. This information is e.g. method parameter names (but method and field names are always stored to allow reflection).

问题 When I compile the code I am writing, then look at in a a JD Gui, methods show up with headers such as the following: public void growSurface(Random paramRandom, int paramInt1, int paramInt2){ I am compiling through a .bat file. Is there a way to specify that I don't want to obfuscate the code. 回答1: By default javac is not including debug information in generated class files. This information is e.g. method parameter names (but method and field names are always stored to allow reflection).