nunit

问题 When I run this FsUnit test with NUnit 2.6.3, let f xs = Some (List.map ((+) 2) xs) [<Test>] let test() = f [] |> should equal (Some []) I get: Result Message: Expected: <Some([])> But was: <Some([])> Result StackTrace: at FsUnit.TopLevelOperators.should[a,a](FSharpFunc`2 f, a x, Object y) The test fails even though the Expected and Actual in the message are the same. What happened? 回答1: The reason is that FsUnit uses untyped mechanism under the hood so Expected is inferred as object by the

问题 I have an MVC 3.0 app. My testing framework is nUnit 2.4.8.0. I started this code on a 32 bit machine, and recently started using a 64 bit machine. I just as recently upgraded the project to .NET 4.0. My application runs fine - I am able to hydrate my objects from the database appropriately. The issue is when I run my integration tests. The tests fail, and give an exception I've never seen before: NHibernate.ADOException : cannot open connection ----> System.BadImageFormatException : An

问题 I have a set of NUnit tests (running using the Resharper test runner), and some of those fail due to assertion exceptions happening in background threads; and when this happens VS2017 breaks into the debugger, what is undesirable as I want it to keep on running other tests. All the settings in "Exception Settings/CLR/Thrown" are turned off. The "User-Unhandled" settings in that dialog aren't present whether I switch the "Just My Code" option on or off All the "Exception Settings/Managed

问题 I inherited an assembly with MSTest, but these tests were run using nunit-console on the build machine (not sure how it worked). So I decided to sort it out and change them to proper NUnit tests, but now nunit-console (or gui) can't find any tests. They run just fine using ReSharper test runner though. Any idea what could be missing? 回答1: Check: Is the class public? Does it have a public parameterless constructor (e.g. the default one if you don't specify any other constructors) Does it have

问题 I'm currently making use of Castle Windsor version 2.1 as my container and would like to perform integration tests using the services registered with it. Currently, I do this my using the Common Service Locator to retrieve my service instance and perform my integration tests against it as such: var myService = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<IMyService>(); // do stuff with myService What I'd ideally like to do is have my service dependencies injected into my NUnit test fixture

问题 I'm currently making use of Castle Windsor version 2.1 as my container and would like to perform integration tests using the services registered with it. Currently, I do this my using the Common Service Locator to retrieve my service instance and perform my integration tests against it as such: var myService = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<IMyService>(); // do stuff with myService What I'd ideally like to do is have my service dependencies injected into my NUnit test fixture

问题 I am trying to use NUnit Runners 2.6.4 to run all test assemblies in my test folder. My current command looks like this: /nologo /noshadow /framework:net-4.0 /xml:.\test\TestResults.xml .\test\*.Test.dll Unfortunately Nunit just throws a System.ArgumentException: Illegal characters in path. Is there anyway I can achieve this? 回答1: It's not possible to use the wildcards for the input files, but you can specify multiple test libraries in the command line: /nologo /noshadow /framework:net-4.0

问题 I've used NUnit with VS2008, and now am adapting to MSTest on VS2010. I used to be able to create an object in TestSetup() and dispose of it in TestCleanup(), and have the object created each time a test method was run in NUnit, preventing me from duplicating the code in each test method. Is this not possible with MSTest? The examples I am finding using the ClassInitialize and ClassCleanup and TestInitialize and TestCleanup attributes only show how to write to the console. None show any more

问题 I have a test where I do not need to run the SetUp method (attributed with [SetUp] ) before running the test. I need the SetUp method to be run for other tests. Is there a different attribute that can be used or a non-attribute-based way to achieve this? 回答1: You should create a new class for that test which has only the setup (or lack of setup) that it needs. Alternatively, you could unfactor the setup code into a method that all the other tests call, but I don't recommend this approach. 回答2

问题 I would like to have my TearDown method check whether the previous test was a success before it applies some logic. Is there an easy way to do this? 回答1: If you want to use TearDown to detect status of last test with NUnit 3.5 it should be: [TearDown] public void TearDown() { if (TestContext.CurrentContext.Result.Outcome.Status == TestStatus.Failed) { //your code } } 回答2: This has been already solved in Ran's answer to similar SO question. Quoting Ran: Since version 2.5.7, NUnit allows