numeric-limits

When a float variable goes out of the float limits, what happens?

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-11-27 15:30:24
I remarked two things: std::numeric_limits<float>::max()+(a small number) gives: std::numeric_limits<float>::max() . std::numeric_limits<float>::max()+(a large number like: std::numeric_limits<float>::max()/3) gives inf. Why this difference? Does 1 or 2 results in an OVERFLOW and thus to an undefined behavior? Edit: Code for testing this: 1. float d = std::numeric_limits<float>::max(); float q = d + 100; cout << "q: " << q << endl; 2. float d = std::numeric_limits<float>::max(); float q = d + (d/3); cout << "q: " << q << endl; Formally, the behavior is undefined. On a machine with IEEE

Why is FLT_MIN equal to zero?

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-11-27 12:23:20
limits.h specifies limits for non-floating point math types, e.g. INT_MIN and INT_MAX . These values are the most negative and most positive values that you can represent using an int. In float.h , there are definitions for FLT_MIN and FLT_MAX . If you do the following: NSLog(@"%f %f", FLT_MIN, FLT_MAX); You get the following output: FLT_MIN = 0.000000, FLT_MAX = 340282346638528859811704183484516925440.000000 FLT_MAX is equal to a really large number, as you would expect, but why does FLT_MIN equal zero instead of a really large negative number? Nick Forge It's not actually zero, but it might

Syntax error with std::numeric_limits::max

那年仲夏 提交于 2019-11-27 10:28:51
问题 I have class struct definition as follows: #include <limits> struct heapStatsFilters { heapStatsFilters(size_t minValue_ = 0, size_t maxValue_ = std::numeric_limits<size_t>::max()) { minMax[0] = minValue_; minMax[1] = maxValue_; } size_t minMax[2]; }; The problem is that I cannot use 'std::numeric_limits::max()' and the compiler says: Error 8 error C2059: syntax error : '::' Error 7 error C2589: '(' : illegal token on right side of '::' The compiler which I am using is Visual C++ 11 (2012)

warning C4003 and errors C2589 and C2059 on: x = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();

邮差的信 提交于 2019-11-27 04:18:20
问题 This line works correctly in a small test program, but in the program for which I want it, I get the following compiler complaints: #include <limits> x = std::numeric_limits<int>::max(); c:\...\x.cpp(192) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro 'max' c:\...\x.cpp(192) : error C2589: '(' : illegal token on right side of '::' c:\...\x.cpp(192) : error C2059: syntax error : '::' I get the same results with: #include <limits> using namespace std; x = numeric_limits<int>::max();

Why is std::numeric_limits<T>::max() a function?

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-11-27 03:04:35
问题 In the C++ Standard Library the value std::numeric_limits<T>::max() is specified as a function. Further properties of a specific type are given as constants (like std::numeric_limits<T>::is_signed ). All constants that are of type T are given as functions, whereas all other constants are given as, well, constant values. What's the rationale behind that? 回答1: To expand on Neil's remark, std::numeric_limit<T> is available for any number type including floating point numbers, and if you dig

Why is 0 < -0x80000000?

≡放荡痞女 提交于 2019-11-26 18:08:48
I have below a simple program: #include <stdio.h> #define INT32_MIN (-0x80000000) int main(void) { long long bal = 0; if(bal < INT32_MIN ) { printf("Failed!!!"); } else { printf("Success!!!"); } return 0; } The condition if(bal < INT32_MIN ) is always true. How is it possible? It works fine if I change the macro to: #define INT32_MIN (-2147483648L) Can anyone point out the issue? Lundin This is quite subtle. Every integer literal in your program has a type. Which type it has is regulated by a table in 6.4.4.1: Suffix Decimal Constant Octal or Hexadecimal Constant none int int long int unsigned

When a float variable goes out of the float limits, what happens?

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-11-26 17:11:36
问题 I remarked two things: std::numeric_limits<float>::max()+(a small number) gives: std::numeric_limits<float>::max() . std::numeric_limits<float>::max()+(a large number like: std::numeric_limits<float>::max()/3) gives inf. Why this difference? Does 1 or 2 results in an OVERFLOW and thus to an undefined behavior? Edit: Code for testing this: 1. float d = std::numeric_limits<float>::max(); float q = d + 100; cout << "q: " << q << endl; 2. float d = std::numeric_limits<float>::max(); float q = d +

Why is FLT_MIN equal to zero?

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-11-26 15:59:10
问题 limits.h specifies limits for non-floating point math types, e.g. INT_MIN and INT_MAX . These values are the most negative and most positive values that you can represent using an int. In float.h , there are definitions for FLT_MIN and FLT_MAX . If you do the following: NSLog(@"%f %f", FLT_MIN, FLT_MAX); You get the following output: FLT_MIN = 0.000000, FLT_MAX = 340282346638528859811704183484516925440.000000 FLT_MAX is equal to a really large number, as you would expect, but why does FLT_MIN

maximum value of int

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-11-26 12:03:50
Is there any code to find the maximum value of integer (accordingly to the compiler) in C/C++ like Integer.MaxValue function in java? Gregory Pakosz In C++: #include <limits> then use int imin = std::numeric_limits<int>::min(); // minimum value int imax = std::numeric_limits<int>::max(); std::numeric_limits is a template type which can be instantiated with other types: float fmin = std::numeric_limits<float>::min(); // minimum positive value float fmax = std::numeric_limits<float>::max(); In C: #include <limits.h> then use int imin = INT_MIN; // minimum value int imax = INT_MAX; or #include

Why is the maximum value of an unsigned n-bit integer 2^n-1 and not 2^n?

点点圈 提交于 2019-11-26 08:08:20
问题 The maximum value of an n -bit integer is 2 n -1. Why do we have the \"minus 1\"? Why isn\'t the maximum just 2 n ? 回答1: The -1 is because integers start at 0, but our counting starts at 1. So, 2^32-1 is the maximum value for a 32-bit unsigned integer (32 binary digits). 2^32 is the number of possible values . To simplify why, look at decimal. 10^2-1 is the maximum value of a 2-digit decimal number (99). Because our intuitive human counting starts at 1, but integers are 0-based, 10^2 is the