nofollow

How to automatically set all links to nofollow in Rails

我们两清 提交于 2019-12-09 16:24:03
问题 I know I can pass :rel => "nofollow" to link_to but is there a way to set that by default so I don't have to make changes in each link_to tag? 回答1: In your application helper you can override the link_to method and replace with your own. def link_to(name, options = {}, html_options = {}) html_options.merge!(:rel => :nofollow) super(name, options, html_options) end 回答2: You could create an alias to the old link_to then override it so it calls the old alias with the extra parameter. That way,

Will Google see rel=nofollow if it is added by jQuery?

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-08 02:36:06
问题 I'm adding a rel=nofollow attribute to links via jQuery after the page load. Will Google see this attribute? I can't find anything in Google's official documentation. 回答1: Although Google processes JavaScript and can index a lot of dynamic content, there's a special behavior when inserting rel=nofollow dynamically. It was tested[1] and they came up with this result: The nofollow in the DOM did not work (the link was followed, and the page indexed). Why? Because the modification of the a href

Will Google see rel=nofollow if it is added by jQuery?

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-06 09:16:48
I'm adding a rel=nofollow attribute to links via jQuery after the page load. Will Google see this attribute? I can't find anything in Google's official documentation. Although Google processes JavaScript and can index a lot of dynamic content, there's a special behavior when inserting rel=nofollow dynamically. It was tested [1] and they came up with this result: The nofollow in the DOM did not work (the link was followed, and the page indexed). Why? Because the modification of the a href element in the DOM happened too late: Google already crawled the link and queued the URL before it executed

Is it useless to add `nofollow` using Javascript?

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-12-05 23:10:04
问题 AFAIK, the rel="nofollow" attribute on links instruct search engines not to follow through the link when it crawls your site, therefore severing all assumption of relationship between your site and the linked site, and therefore, not sharing any of your SEO goodness. For the most part, that's a Good Thing™ on a comment system. Now, after integrating an IntenseDebate system on my site, I noticed that the commenter names link through their respective websites without nofollow . This kind of

X-Robots noindex specific page in .htaccess

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-12-05 09:05:28
Can I 'noindex, follow' a specific page using x robots in .htaccess? I've found some instructions for noindexing types of files, but I can't find instruction to noindex a single page, and what I have tried so far hasn't worked. This is the page I'm looking to noindex: http://www.examplesite.com.au/index.php?route=news/headlines This is what I have tried so far: <FilesMatch "/index.php?route=news/headlines$"> Header set X-Robots-Tag "noindex, follow" </FilesMatch> Thanks for your time. It seems to be impossible to match the request parameters from within a .htaccess file. Here is a list of what

How to remove rel=“nofollow” from feed page

雨燕双飞 提交于 2019-12-04 19:43:54
In this page every link has rel="nofollow" . can you guys please tell me how to remove the nofollow from that page. I am using WordPress them. Hoping to receive some help from your side Thanks in advance To remove nofollow from link please add the below code in your current active theme functions.php file. The rss hook not allow to change content within tag, so create custom template for your feed. /** * Deal with the custom RSS templates. */ function my_custom_rss() { if ( 'photos' === get_query_var( 'post_type' ) ) { get_template_part( 'feed', 'photos' ); } else { get_template_part( 'feed',

Precedence of X-Robots-Tag header vs robots meta tag

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-12-04 17:50:59
问题 I've placed the following Header in my vhost config: Header set X-Robots-Tag "noindex, nofollow" The goal here is to just disable search engines from indexing my testing environment. The site is Wordpress and there is a plugin installed to manage per-page the meta robots settings. For example: <meta name="robots" content="index, follow" /> So my question is, which directive will take precedence over the other since both are being set on every page? 回答1: I am not sure if a definitive answer

Is it useless to add `nofollow` using Javascript?

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-12-04 04:46:48
AFAIK, the rel="nofollow" attribute on links instruct search engines not to follow through the link when it crawls your site, therefore severing all assumption of relationship between your site and the linked site, and therefore, not sharing any of your SEO goodness. For the most part, that's a Good Thing™ on a comment system. Now, after integrating an IntenseDebate system on my site, I noticed that the commenter names link through their respective websites without nofollow . This kind of raised an alarm in my head --- that is, until I realized that these were generated dynamically via AJAX.

How to automatically set all links to nofollow in Rails

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-04 03:43:54
I know I can pass :rel => "nofollow" to link_to but is there a way to set that by default so I don't have to make changes in each link_to tag? Jesse Wolgamott In your application helper you can override the link_to method and replace with your own. def link_to(name, options = {}, html_options = {}) html_options.merge!(:rel => :nofollow) super(name, options, html_options) end Zaki You could create an alias to the old link_to then override it so it calls the old alias with the extra parameter. That way, you don't have to change all the existing link_to in your code. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com

Precedence of X-Robots-Tag header vs robots meta tag

被刻印的时光 ゝ 提交于 2019-12-03 11:30:39
I've placed the following Header in my vhost config: Header set X-Robots-Tag "noindex, nofollow" The goal here is to just disable search engines from indexing my testing environment. The site is Wordpress and there is a plugin installed to manage per-page the meta robots settings. For example: <meta name="robots" content="index, follow" /> So my question is, which directive will take precedence over the other since both are being set on every page? d-stroyer I am not sure if a definitive answer can be given to the question, as the behavior may be implementation-dependent (on the robot side).