ng-bind | 易学教程

Send html content with variables to template from controller AngularJS

阅读更多关于 Send html content with variables to template from controller AngularJS

问题 After being searching for this issue for a long time, I decided to do my first question in StackOverflow. I hope anyone can help me. I'm doing a ui.bootstrap.carousel with different slides. The initial structure is the following : <carousel interval="carInterval" no-pause="true"> <slide> some html content, {{ modules }} </slide> <slide> totally different content, {{ more variables }} </slide> </carousel> That worked really well at the start, even without using ng-repeat and any active

Angularjs: server side (php) rendering and data binding client side after an event

阅读更多关于 Angularjs: server side (php) rendering and data binding client side after an event

问题 The backend delivers a fully rendered site and on the frontend I want for angularjs to handle the dynamic content through ajax-call /data binding but if you deliver the directive ng-bind then angularjs binds them directly to their initial value which is NULL before any user action. I found a hacky solution but I wanted to know if there is a better one or maybe another js framework that does exactly what I'm trying to do : https://github.com/herschel666/angular-lazy-bind the following example

AngularJS - Why is ng-bind faster than expressions?

阅读更多关于 AngularJS - Why is ng-bind faster than expressions?

问题 From this question and this answer, it seems that using expressions will cause the value to be evaluated from scratch every time. But I've searched the documentation and tutorials, and I haven't found a reference for this statement. In my mind, both are wrapped in a $watch() and so when the $digest() cycle runs it will see whether the value inside ng-bind or {{}} has changed. On performance, why is ng-bind better than {{}} as has been suggested, and where's the reference? 回答1: Details like

Angular.js 1.3 One-time binding in ng-bind

阅读更多关于 Angular.js 1.3 One-time binding in ng-bind

问题 In Angular.js 1.3 I can do a one time binding with: {{::name}} But how may I use this in ng-bind ? ng-bind had some performance improvements in comparison to the {{ syntax. Is it supported? 回答1: Yes. This works: <span ng-bind="::name"></span> 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26735629/angular-js-1-3-one-time-binding-in-ng-bind

Angularjs: server side (php) rendering and data binding client side after an event

阅读更多关于 Angularjs: server side (php) rendering and data binding client side after an event

The backend delivers a fully rendered site and on the frontend I want for angularjs to handle the dynamic content through ajax-call /data binding but if you deliver the directive ng-bind then angularjs binds them directly to their initial value which is NULL before any user action. I found a hacky solution but I wanted to know if there is a better one or maybe another js framework that does exactly what I'm trying to do : https://github.com/herschel666/angular-lazy-bind the following example should help to understand my problem... once js is loaded the inital value "hola server side"(server

AngularJS - Why is ng-bind faster than expressions?

阅读更多关于 AngularJS - Why is ng-bind faster than expressions?

From this question and this answer , it seems that using expressions will cause the value to be evaluated from scratch every time. But I've searched the documentation and tutorials, and I haven't found a reference for this statement. In my mind, both are wrapped in a $watch() and so when the $digest() cycle runs it will see whether the value inside ng-bind or {{}} has changed. On performance, why is ng-bind better than {{}} as has been suggested, and where's the reference? Matti Virkkunen Details like this aren't always available in the documentation - you have to read the source. I took a

Optimise ng-bind directive in angularjs

阅读更多关于 Optimise ng-bind directive in angularjs

问题 In my angular js app I have an array of objects $scope.time which contain a name, the current time and another defined time in milliseconds. In the front-end I'm using ng-bind to calculate the difference between these two time and display it in H:m:s format. Please run the code below. var app = angular.module('angularapp', []); app.filter("msTotime", function() { return function(timee,started,ended) { var startDate = new Date(started); var endDate = new Date(ended); var milisecondsDiff =

Angular.js 1.3 One-time binding in ng-bind

阅读更多关于 Angular.js 1.3 One-time binding in ng-bind

In Angular.js 1.3 I can do a one time binding with: {{::name}} But how may I use this in ng-bind ? ng-bind had some performance improvements in comparison to the {{ syntax. Is it supported? Yes. This works: <span ng-bind="::name"></span> 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26735629/angular-js-1-3-one-time-binding-in-ng-bind

Escaping & > characters in ng-bind in AngularJs

阅读更多关于 Escaping & > characters in ng-bind in AngularJs

I have a use case, where we can have '&' and '>' characters in a string. eg. Johnson & Johnson, value > 3 . So while the response from server is encoded, hence the value becomes 'value &ampgt; 3'. ng-bind doesn't support the following: value > 3 will be rendered for ngBind , whereas the browser renders the same content as value > 3 . http://jsfiddle.net/HKahG/2/ Ng:bind <div ng-bind="model"></div> Ng:bind-html <div ng-bind-html="model"></div> <div> From Div: value > </div> Why is this default browser behavior not present in ng-bind ?. I don't want to use ng-bind-html (has issues with value <

AngularJS ng-bind with a function

阅读更多关于 AngularJS ng-bind with a function

问题 I want to show a table format for the Attachments section. I have the lookup and results data. Both have a common column of attachmentTypeId . I want to show the attachment category description based on the id. In the ng-bind I tried an attempt, it's not worked. I am using a function in the ng-bind , hope the approach is wrong, expect an alternate for the approach. The attachmentLookup contains the attachmentDesc , attachmentTypeId $scope.attachmentLookup = [{ "attachmentDesc": "Category One"