linker

问题 I'm wondering if its possible to write a javascript program and have it compiled and linked into an executable? If so would it be possible to create a libjs that would be the equivalent of libc for the c/c++ world? wouldn't creating something like this make javascript a full fledged language that could then be compiled and run directly on the target hardware? If you had a compiler for javascript, couldn't you write a new compiler in javascript? 回答1: Yes, you could write a js compiler. Not

问题 I'm wondering if its possible to write a javascript program and have it compiled and linked into an executable? If so would it be possible to create a libjs that would be the equivalent of libc for the c/c++ world? wouldn't creating something like this make javascript a full fledged language that could then be compiled and run directly on the target hardware? If you had a compiler for javascript, couldn't you write a new compiler in javascript? 回答1: Yes, you could write a js compiler. Not

问题 I'm wondering if its possible to write a javascript program and have it compiled and linked into an executable? If so would it be possible to create a libjs that would be the equivalent of libc for the c/c++ world? wouldn't creating something like this make javascript a full fledged language that could then be compiled and run directly on the target hardware? If you had a compiler for javascript, couldn't you write a new compiler in javascript? 回答1: Yes, you could write a js compiler. Not

问题 I'm wondering if its possible to write a javascript program and have it compiled and linked into an executable? If so would it be possible to create a libjs that would be the equivalent of libc for the c/c++ world? wouldn't creating something like this make javascript a full fledged language that could then be compiled and run directly on the target hardware? If you had a compiler for javascript, couldn't you write a new compiler in javascript? 回答1: Yes, you could write a js compiler. Not

问题 I'm wondering if its possible to write a javascript program and have it compiled and linked into an executable? If so would it be possible to create a libjs that would be the equivalent of libc for the c/c++ world? wouldn't creating something like this make javascript a full fledged language that could then be compiled and run directly on the target hardware? If you had a compiler for javascript, couldn't you write a new compiler in javascript? 回答1: Yes, you could write a js compiler. Not

问题 I'm wondering if its possible to write a javascript program and have it compiled and linked into an executable? If so would it be possible to create a libjs that would be the equivalent of libc for the c/c++ world? wouldn't creating something like this make javascript a full fledged language that could then be compiled and run directly on the target hardware? If you had a compiler for javascript, couldn't you write a new compiler in javascript? 回答1: Yes, you could write a js compiler. Not

问题 The below link https://www.iar.com/support/tech-notes/linker/how-do-i-place-a-group-of-functions-or-variables-in-a-specific-section/ explains how a group of variables can be placed in a specific section, this is with IAR arm linker. Pasting the example (for which i want a gcc equivalent) from the link here /* Place following data in section MY_DATA */ #pragma default_variable_attributes = @ "MY_DATA" int data1; int data2; /* Stop placing data in section MY_DATA */ #pragma default_variable

问题 I have 2 yocto pkgs that can be successfully compiled with gcc 5.4, cmake 3.6.1 on yocto 2.0.2 but I'm facing the following issue with: gcc 6.3, cmake 3.6.1 on yocto 2.4 . After some research, I observed that yocto changed the sysroot structure (sysroot per package instead of a common sysroot). The error looks like this: CMake Warning at src/mytest/CMakeLists.txt:71 (add_executable): Cannot generate a safe linker search path for target mytest because files in some directories may conflict

问题 I have a project with this structure: /path/to/my/project ├── CMakeLists.txt ├── internal-libs │ ├── internal-lib1 ├── libs │ ├── lib1 │ ├── lib2 lib1 is a static library. lib2 is a static library. internal-lib1 is a static library. lib2 links statically to lib2 and internal-lib1. lib1 and lib2 are going to be exported but internal-lib1 will be left behind. For the linkage, I have: target_link_libraries(lib2 PRIVATE internal-lib1) target_link_libraries(lib2 PRIVATE lib1) My understanding is

问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 9 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Static variables in C++ // x.h int i = 3; // x1.cpp #include"x.h" //... // x2.cpp #include"x.h" //... Above code will give linker error. However If I declare, //x.h static int i = 3; It doesn't give linker error in gcc, even we have the same #include ! Are we creating different static int i; for every .cpp file ? Will it cause any silent linking bug (due to same name)? 回答1: Are we creating different static int i