kiln

How to remove largefiles from Mercurial repo

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-12-05 05:10:39
See also this question . Without knowing what I was doing, I enabled the largefiles extension, committed a file and pushed it to kiln. Now I know the error of my ways, and I need to permanently revert this change. I followed the guidance from SO on the subject; and I can remove largefiles locally, but this doesn't affect the remote repos in kiln. I have tried opening the repo in KilnRepositories on the Kiln server and nuking the largefiles folder (as well as deleting 'largefiles' from the requires file), but after a few pushes/pulls the folder and the require's line come back. Is there a way

Push to multiple remote repositories from a single local repo in Mercurial

半腔热情 提交于 2019-12-03 14:38:37
问题 I was considering using AppHarbor to host a lightweight website and was investigating their Mercurial integration. Currently I use Kiln for my remote repositories, but currently AppHarbor only supports BitBucket integration. Is it possible to have 2 remote repositories for a single local repository? So when I push commits from my local, they both get the push? I don't ever want to pull from BitBucket, only push so that it can then be grabbed by AppHarbor and deployed. 回答1: You can set

Automated sync between Github and Kiln

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-12-03 12:19:55
I am a frontend designer and don't have a large programming background. I do CSS/html and a bit of JavaScript. The tech team at our company has moved our version control from Git (github) to Mercurial (Kiln). The only reason for them is to get the code review feature of Kiln (we use Fogbugz and love it). The problem is that the frontenders and non-developers working in our version control are funcking up all the time. We use hg-git to deploy on Heroku and are used to git (never worked with other version control systems). I am sure that Mercurial is a great tool, but I must conclude that we

Push to multiple remote repositories from a single local repo in Mercurial

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-03 04:23:06
I was considering using AppHarbor to host a lightweight website and was investigating their Mercurial integration. Currently I use Kiln for my remote repositories, but currently AppHarbor only supports BitBucket integration. Is it possible to have 2 remote repositories for a single local repository? So when I push commits from my local, they both get the push? I don't ever want to pull from BitBucket, only push so that it can then be grabbed by AppHarbor and deployed. You can set multiple remote repository aliases in the [paths] section of the repository configuration file. This file is in .hg

Is Kiln for your server being retired? [closed]

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-12-03 01:59:51
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. I was looking into the Kiln Harmony feature and saw that FogCreek only advertises it in On Demand. In the "How do you get it" section they don't even mention that it is not available for the On Premise version. So I went looking for details of the "Kiln on your Server" pricing to see what was included. I can't even find pricing for the licensing anymore. Is the hosted version now the only Kiln available? I submitted the

idiots checklist for mercurial with visual studio 2010

梦想与她 提交于 2019-12-02 17:18:30
So Im a source control idiot so please humor me with this checklist. I finally decided to use Mercurial + TortoiseHg + (VS2010 + HgSccPackage ) + Kiln for my next project. I read http://hginit.com/ and I played around quite a bit, but I don't know much about source control so I don't want to make a mistake here, my current project is my biggest and most valuable one yet. So here is my checklist: Creation : I create a new repo in kiln online. Then clone it on my pc. I copy my entire project folder (Solution with mutiple projects under that folder) into the repo. I add this content into a

Why Kiln is based on Mercurial, and not other (D)VCS

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-27 19:59:53
What were the reason for chosing Mercurial as a basis of FogCreek Kiln , a source control management system with tightly integrated code review, and FogBugz integration? Why Mercurial, and not other (distributed) version control system, like Bazaar, Git or Monotone, or creating own version control system like Fossil (distributed software configuration management, including bug tracking and wiki) did? What were features that make FogCreek choose Mercurial as Kiln engine? deft_code Here's an answer from one of the Kiln developers. It provides real branching. It's easy to use. Windows support is

how to ignore files in kiln/mercurial using tortoise hg “that are part of the repository”

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-11-26 21:03:12
We use tortoise hg with Kiln. In my vs 2010 c# project there are some files that are part of the repository but I would like tortoise hg to ignore them when I make a commit. For eg., say in a login screen I may hard code the userid, password for testing. I dont really want this file considered during a commit. I understand .hgignore file but this really works for files that are not part of the repo. Any trick in tortoise hg to ignore files that are part of the repo ? (so they do not show up as modified (M) during a commit.) thanks I always use a combination of .hgignore and BeforeBuild (in the

how to ignore files in kiln/mercurial using tortoise hg “that are part of the repository”

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2019-11-26 07:49:11
问题 We use tortoise hg with Kiln. In my vs 2010 c# project there are some files that are part of the repository but I would like tortoise hg to ignore them when I make a commit. For eg., say in a login screen I may hard code the userid, password for testing. I dont really want this file considered during a commit. I understand .hgignore file but this really works for files that are not part of the repo. Any trick in tortoise hg to ignore files that are part of the repo ? (so they do not show up