iodbc

How to build pyodbc with links to iODBC in macOS?

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-12-23 05:02:51
问题 In Driver for pyodbc: how to specify its location in macOS?, TallTed suggested to open question to explain the following Build pyodbc with links to iODBC (not its default of UnixODBC, which is not typical for macOS). so now with the focus — How can I build pyodbc with links to iODBC (not its default of UnixODBC, which is not typical for macOS)? 回答1: This should/might work in 4.0.23, as it was the way it was done up to pyodbc v3.0.7: First, in the file 'setup.py' change line 165 from: settings

how to install RODBC on macOS Sierra 10.12.4

风格不统一 提交于 2019-12-13 12:41:57
问题 In R 3.4.0, install.packages('RODBC', type='source') fails on macOS 10.12.4. I also downloaded RODBC_1.3-15.tar.gz from CRAN and tried, R CMD INSTALL RODBC_1.3-15.tar.gz In both cases, I got "ODBC headers sql.h and sqlext.h not found". A discussion of this in Installation of RODBC/ROracle packages on OS X Mavericks says the following: To fix this, you need to download the latest version of iODBC (www.iodbc.org), and then unzip the file and set your header and library search paths to the

how to install RODBC on macOS Sierra 10.12.4

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-08 18:32:28
In R 3.4.0, install.packages('RODBC', type='source') fails on macOS 10.12.4. I also downloaded RODBC_1.3-15.tar.gz from CRAN and tried, R CMD INSTALL RODBC_1.3-15.tar.gz In both cases, I got "ODBC headers sql.h and sqlext.h not found". A discussion of this in Installation of RODBC/ROracle packages on OS X Mavericks says the following: To fix this, you need to download the latest version of iODBC (www.iodbc.org), and then unzip the file and set your header and library search paths to the location where you put the unzipped package. If you don't know how to set your search paths, you could just

What are the functional differences between iODBC and unixODBC?

你离开我真会死。 提交于 2019-11-27 13:31:33
问题 There are two major Open Source platform independent implementation of the ODBC. It is iODBC and unixODBC. Considering Unix as ODBC user platform and feature-wise, what are the real practical differences between these two implementations? 回答1: Just so you know I use and have contributed to unixODBC and I don't use iODBC. Unicode support unixODBC follows MS ODBC Driver manager and has SQLWCHARs as 2 bytes UCS2 encoded. iODBC I believe uses wchar_t (this is based on attempting to support iODBC