instantiation

Objects does not include methods in the list comprehension

狂风中的少年 提交于 2020-12-31 05:54:55
问题 This question is related to my previous question and Bill's response there. I have a class named StrucData in subfile.py class StrucData: def __init__(self, name): self.name=name def loadData(self, size=1, cost=1): self.size=size self.cost=cost return self In the main file I: call the subfile, create a list of data names loop through the list to instantiate the objects; and load data using 'loadData' method for each object (I'm using the same 'size' and 'cost' to make this example easy.) in

Forcing the compiler to generate code for all member functions of a template class?

不想你离开。 提交于 2020-12-10 05:52:32
问题 Say I have this program #include <iostream> using namespace std; template<typename T> class A { public: void foo() { cout << "Inside foo" << endl; } void bar() { cout << "Inside bar" << endl; } }; int main() { A<int> a; a.foo(); return 0; } Both g++ and clang++ only generate code for A<int>::foo() , but not for A<int>::bar() . This is annoying when you want to call this function while debugging. (e.g. vector<T>::at() ). Is there some flag or other method by which you can force the generation

Forcing the compiler to generate code for all member functions of a template class?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2020-12-10 05:51:46
问题 Say I have this program #include <iostream> using namespace std; template<typename T> class A { public: void foo() { cout << "Inside foo" << endl; } void bar() { cout << "Inside bar" << endl; } }; int main() { A<int> a; a.foo(); return 0; } Both g++ and clang++ only generate code for A<int>::foo() , but not for A<int>::bar() . This is annoying when you want to call this function while debugging. (e.g. vector<T>::at() ). Is there some flag or other method by which you can force the generation

Forcing the compiler to generate code for all member functions of a template class?

限于喜欢 提交于 2020-12-10 05:51:14
问题 Say I have this program #include <iostream> using namespace std; template<typename T> class A { public: void foo() { cout << "Inside foo" << endl; } void bar() { cout << "Inside bar" << endl; } }; int main() { A<int> a; a.foo(); return 0; } Both g++ and clang++ only generate code for A<int>::foo() , but not for A<int>::bar() . This is annoying when you want to call this function while debugging. (e.g. vector<T>::at() ). Is there some flag or other method by which you can force the generation

Forcing the compiler to generate code for all member functions of a template class?

China☆狼群 提交于 2020-12-10 05:51:02
问题 Say I have this program #include <iostream> using namespace std; template<typename T> class A { public: void foo() { cout << "Inside foo" << endl; } void bar() { cout << "Inside bar" << endl; } }; int main() { A<int> a; a.foo(); return 0; } Both g++ and clang++ only generate code for A<int>::foo() , but not for A<int>::bar() . This is annoying when you want to call this function while debugging. (e.g. vector<T>::at() ). Is there some flag or other method by which you can force the generation

Does an explicit instantiation declaration of a member function of a class template cause instantiation of the class template?

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2020-12-06 16:00:14
问题 [dcl.spec.auto]/14 states [ emphasis mine]: An explicit instantiation declaration does not cause the instantiation of an entity declared using a placeholder type , but it also does not prevent that entity from being instantiated as needed to determine its type. [  Example: template <typename T> auto f(T t) { return t; } extern template auto f(int); // does not instantiate f<int> int (*p)(int) = f; // instantiates f<int> to determine its return type, but an explicit // instantiation definition

Does an explicit instantiation declaration of a member function of a class template cause instantiation of the class template?

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2020-12-06 15:55:26
问题 [dcl.spec.auto]/14 states [ emphasis mine]: An explicit instantiation declaration does not cause the instantiation of an entity declared using a placeholder type , but it also does not prevent that entity from being instantiated as needed to determine its type. [  Example: template <typename T> auto f(T t) { return t; } extern template auto f(int); // does not instantiate f<int> int (*p)(int) = f; // instantiates f<int> to determine its return type, but an explicit // instantiation definition

Does an explicit instantiation declaration of a member function of a class template cause instantiation of the class template?

孤者浪人 提交于 2020-12-06 15:52:14
问题 [dcl.spec.auto]/14 states [ emphasis mine]: An explicit instantiation declaration does not cause the instantiation of an entity declared using a placeholder type , but it also does not prevent that entity from being instantiated as needed to determine its type. [  Example: template <typename T> auto f(T t) { return t; } extern template auto f(int); // does not instantiate f<int> int (*p)(int) = f; // instantiates f<int> to determine its return type, but an explicit // instantiation definition