hoogle

Hayoo/Hoogle not matching monomorphic/less polymorphic signatures with polymorphic ones

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2020-05-11 05:14:07
问题 I'm trying to understand if there's a fundamental reason for why Hoogle and Hayoo aren't matching, for instance (b -> c) -> (b' -> c') -> (b, b') -> (c, c') to a b c -> a b' c' -> a (b, b') (c, c') which happens to be the type of Control.Arrow.***: (***) :: a b c -> a b' c' -> a (b, b') (c, c') — is this likely just something that's as-of-yet unimplemented, or is there something fundamental that is preventing this sort of type based search from ever being implemented? 回答1: With Hoogle, it

Hayoo/Hoogle not matching monomorphic/less polymorphic signatures with polymorphic ones

六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2020-05-11 05:11:46
问题 I'm trying to understand if there's a fundamental reason for why Hoogle and Hayoo aren't matching, for instance (b -> c) -> (b' -> c') -> (b, b') -> (c, c') to a b c -> a b' c' -> a (b, b') (c, c') which happens to be the type of Control.Arrow.***: (***) :: a b c -> a b' c' -> a (b, b') (c, c') — is this likely just something that's as-of-yet unimplemented, or is there something fundamental that is preventing this sort of type based search from ever being implemented? 回答1: With Hoogle, it

Haskell hoogle installed through cabal, but hoogle command not found

不想你离开。 提交于 2019-12-19 19:41:02
问题 The hoogle (hoogle-4.2.36) installation process looks successful, except that when typing "hoogle" at the command line, it complains "hoogle: command not found". Tried this on two machines (both running MAC OS X Yosemite), they failed exactly the same way. Any suggestions to resolve this? Thanks! 回答1: Thanks to your information, I found my "hoogle" executable in ".cabal/bin". Alas, why doesn't cabal add it to PATH? 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27328678/haskell-hoogle-installed

Hoogle Git repository

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-12-12 18:08:22
问题 Is there a way to use type signature searches on not just the current working set, but the entire history of a project? The purpose would be to find and possibly recycle Haskell functions that were previously written and tested, but removed due to lack of use/need. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45970886/hoogle-git-repository

Haskell hoogle installed through cabal, but hoogle command not found

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-01 17:07:57
The hoogle (hoogle-4.2.36) installation process looks successful, except that when typing "hoogle" at the command line, it complains "hoogle: command not found". Tried this on two machines (both running MAC OS X Yosemite), they failed exactly the same way. Any suggestions to resolve this? Thanks! Thanks to your information, I found my "hoogle" executable in ".cabal/bin". Alas, why doesn't cabal add it to PATH? 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27328678/haskell-hoogle-installed-through-cabal-but-hoogle-command-not-found

Accessing documentation for a function from Hoogle command line

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-12-01 05:44:09
When searching for a function on the Hoogle website , one sees the documentation associated with it, e.g.: mod :: a -> a -> a infixl 7 integer modulus, satisfying (x `div` y)*y + (x `mod` y) == x Hoogle also exists as a command line executable. As far as I know, it only shows the signature of the function: ~ ❯❯❯ hoogle --info Prelude.mod Prelude mod :: Integral a => a -> a -> a From package base mod :: Integral a => a -> a -> a Is there a way to get the associated documentation through the command line, as in the online version? luntain Use the -i option. It is not obvious how to get help for

Accessing documentation for a function from Hoogle command line

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-01 02:41:58
问题 When searching for a function on the Hoogle website, one sees the documentation associated with it, e.g.: mod :: a -> a -> a infixl 7 integer modulus, satisfying (x `div` y)*y + (x `mod` y) == x Hoogle also exists as a command line executable. As far as I know, it only shows the signature of the function: ~ ❯❯❯ hoogle --info Prelude.mod Prelude mod :: Integral a => a -> a -> a From package base mod :: Integral a => a -> a -> a Is there a way to get the associated documentation through the