git-track

“git remote show origin”: why all branches show “tracked” even when some aren't?

旧街凉风 提交于 2020-06-22 12:22:11
问题 Why does "git remote show origin" list remote branches as "tracked" even when those branches are not linked to a local branch for pull/push? Does "tracked" mean something else in this context? I thought that was the whole meaning of "tracked": git docs on branch tracking. 1) clone a repo with more than one remote branch 2) run git remote show origin -- says "testBranch" is tracked. But git branch -vv correctly shows only master tracking origin/master, and git branch -a correctly shows that

What is Tracked files and Untracked files in the context of GIT?

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-12-20 11:08:03
问题 I'm new to Git. I wish to know what are tracked and untracked files? I read "Pro Git", but still couldn't quite understand. Can someone explain to me the difference between the two by providing an example? 回答1: A file is tracked if it is under version control. As a small example, a C++ project would have Makefile main.cpp interface.hpp worker.cpp as source files; you'd put these under version control. During build, main.o worker.o myapp are generated; these do not belong under version control

What is Tracked files and Untracked files in the context of GIT?

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-03 02:19:42
I'm new to Git. I wish to know what are tracked and untracked files? I read "Pro Git", but still couldn't quite understand. Can someone explain to me the difference between the two by providing an example? A file is tracked if it is under version control. As a small example, a C++ project would have Makefile main.cpp interface.hpp worker.cpp as source files; you'd put these under version control. During build, main.o worker.o myapp are generated; these do not belong under version control, so you do not use git add on them. They remain untracked , because git does not care what happens to them.

Is it possible to stop tracking local changes to a file that you *do* want to be pulled down if changed in the repo?

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-12-01 09:36:18
We have a config file in the repo which all the users contribute to based on their function. For my local testing, I need to manually change two values in that config file, but I never want my changes committed back to the server. I do however want to pull updates to the file if there's a newer version in the repo, even if that means my local changes will be overwritten. That's fine, I can just make them again from a stash I created specifically to do exactly that. What I'm wondering is if I can tell Git "Hey... I will never push back my local changes to the server, so don't show it to me as

Is it possible to stop tracking local changes to a file that you *do* want to be pulled down if changed in the repo?

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-01 06:53:33
问题 We have a config file in the repo which all the users contribute to based on their function. For my local testing, I need to manually change two values in that config file, but I never want my changes committed back to the server. I do however want to pull updates to the file if there's a newer version in the repo, even if that means my local changes will be overwritten. That's fine, I can just make them again from a stash I created specifically to do exactly that. What I'm wondering is if I

How do you stop tracking a remote branch in Git?

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-11-26 09:06:38
How do you stop tracking a remote branch in Git ? I am asking to stop tracking because in my concrete case, I want to delete the local branch, but not the remote one. Deleting the local one and pushing the deletion to remote will delete the remote branch as well: How do I delete a Git branch both locally and in GitHub? Can I just do git branch -d the_branch , and it won't get propagated when I later git push ? Will it only propagate if I were to run git push origin :the_branch later on? VonC As mentioned in Yoshua Wuyts ' answer , using git branch : git branch --unset-upstream Other options:

How do you stop tracking a remote branch in Git?

十年热恋 提交于 2019-11-26 01:55:26
问题 How do you stop tracking a remote branch in Git? I am asking to stop tracking because in my concrete case, I want to delete the local branch, but not the remote one. Deleting the local one and pushing the deletion to remote will delete the remote branch as well: How do I delete a Git branch both locally and in GitHub? Can I just do git branch -d the_branch , and it won\'t get propagated when I later git push ? Will it only propagate if I were to run git push origin :the_branch later on? 回答1:

git submodule tracking latest

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-11-25 23:57:50
问题 We are moving our (huge) project to git and we are thinking about using submodules. Our plan is to have three different heads in the superproject: release,stable,latest. The project leads will handle the release and stable branches. They will move the submodules as required. The issue is the \"latest\" head. We would like the superproject \"latest\" head to track the master branches of all the submodules (automatically). And also it would be great if it would show the history of all commits