git-pull

问题 For a personal project where I'm the only one creating code, I sometimes switch between two different IDEs. As such, the source code is stored locally in two different places. I would like to have a history/backup of the code on Bitbucket. Is Git able to handle this? I have foo.cpp in the directory source_code . I do not want to copy everything from the remote repo into source_code . After adding and committing foo.cpp I try to run git push origin master and it gives the error ! [rejected]

问题 I had one remote repository where I made some local commits(~6 commits) in let's say repo A and pushed those commits to GitHub and then I made some changes that I didn't commit or pushed. Later I renamed that repo in GitHub and instead of update the references, I cloned to another directory, let's say local repo B, and I made more commits(~30 commits) and pushed them and I deleted the repo B. Then I noticed that the repo A has unpushed changes, I didn't pull the new commits just committed the

问题 I had one remote repository where I made some local commits(~6 commits) in let's say repo A and pushed those commits to GitHub and then I made some changes that I didn't commit or pushed. Later I renamed that repo in GitHub and instead of update the references, I cloned to another directory, let's say local repo B, and I made more commits(~30 commits) and pushed them and I deleted the repo B. Then I noticed that the repo A has unpushed changes, I didn't pull the new commits just committed the

问题 Why is that git pull pulls everything including newly created remote branches but git pull origin master does not? I'm using git version 2.9.3.windows.2 . 回答1: When you specify no branches, the default settings are used. The default means to fetch and update all branches existing in the remote repository. See documentation for details: git pull [options] [<repository> [<refspec>…​]] <refspec> specifies which refs to fetch and which local refs to update. When no <refspec> s appear on the

问题 Why is that git pull pulls everything including newly created remote branches but git pull origin master does not? I'm using git version 2.9.3.windows.2 . 回答1: When you specify no branches, the default settings are used. The default means to fetch and update all branches existing in the remote repository. See documentation for details: git pull [options] [<repository> [<refspec>…​]] <refspec> specifies which refs to fetch and which local refs to update. When no <refspec> s appear on the

问题 When I am trying to pull my git repository with "git pull", it keeps telling me that I have local changes although I have not touched any of the mentioned files. Can someone explain this behavior and knows a solution? git status: # On branch master # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be fast-forwarded. # (use "git pull" to update your local branch) # # Changes not staged for commit: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout --

问题 When I am trying to pull my git repository with "git pull", it keeps telling me that I have local changes although I have not touched any of the mentioned files. Can someone explain this behavior and knows a solution? git status: # On branch master # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be fast-forwarded. # (use "git pull" to update your local branch) # # Changes not staged for commit: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout --

问题 When I do a git pull , from the git bash, the terminal usually runs the pull, updates my local, and then hangs. I'm not sure if it's waiting for me to do something, but I usually exit out of this with CTRL-C . After that, I get that an index.lock is preventing me from doing other things to which I have to delete it. Am I misunderstanding how git pull works? 回答1: You may need to remove unnecessary git objects such as dangling commits & blobs : git fsck && git gc --prune=now git-fsck : Verifies

问题 Say there is a remote branch br1 checkout on the remote repo, and the master branch on a local repo. Command 1: If I do a " git pull origin br1:br1 " it pulls remote br1 into local br1 , and shows: 9188a5d..97d4825 br1 -> br1 9188a5d..97d4825 br1 -> origin/br1 command 2: If I do just a " git pull ", it will pull remote br1 into local master , but it shows only the following: 9188a5d..97d4825 br1 -> origin/br1 I'm expecting it also shows something like " br1 -> master ". Why it does not show

问题 When I git pull in any repository, I always get the following merge error: aetherboard:shwangster shwangster$ git pull -v From github.com:sirspinach/shwangster = [up to date] master -> origin/master merge: 012012012012012012012012012012012012012012012012012012012012 - not something we can merge On the other hand, git fetch and git merge origin/master work like a charm. So I've been able to work around this problem for a while. However, I needed to update brew today, and the same error