git-pull

问题 I commited a new feature locally, pulled from remote and got merge conflicts. After resolving them, my feature stopped working (seems like I made an error). My idea was to go back to my commit and somehow repeat the merge. I checked out my commit, made a new branch, checked out master and tried to merge the new branch into master. This didn't work because "Everything is up to date". How do I best handle this if I don't want to fix the error by looking through the code by hand? /edit : I

问题 I commited a new feature locally, pulled from remote and got merge conflicts. After resolving them, my feature stopped working (seems like I made an error). My idea was to go back to my commit and somehow repeat the merge. I checked out my commit, made a new branch, checked out master and tried to merge the new branch into master. This didn't work because "Everything is up to date". How do I best handle this if I don't want to fix the error by looking through the code by hand? /edit : I

问题 Is git push with several commits an atomic operation? with regards to other git push operations to the same branch with regards to git pull operations from the same branch For case 1. it has to be. Otherwise my commits would interfere with someone else's commits, possibly creating an inconsistent or invalid state. Git prevents that by either forcing me to integrate someone else's changes first (if I lose the race) or forcing someone else to integrate my changes (if I win the race). But what

问题 Is git push with several commits an atomic operation? with regards to other git push operations to the same branch with regards to git pull operations from the same branch For case 1. it has to be. Otherwise my commits would interfere with someone else's commits, possibly creating an inconsistent or invalid state. Git prevents that by either forcing me to integrate someone else's changes first (if I lose the race) or forcing someone else to integrate my changes (if I win the race). But what

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12517097/can-i-define-multiple-upstream-branches-for-a-local-branch

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38017517/git-pull-rebase-vs-git-rebase-whats-the-danger

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47835297/resolve-merge-conflict-only-for-some-files-and-commit-to-branch-for-other-teams

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47835297/resolve-merge-conflict-only-for-some-files-and-commit-to-branch-for-other-teams

问题 The documentation at Github-Help: Syncing a Fork shows three commands to keep my GitHub fork in sync with the upstream repo. git fetch upstream git checkout master git merge upstream/master Can I use the following two commands instead of the above three? git checkout master git pull upstream/master Are the two sets of commands equivalent, or are there differences between them? 回答1: These command sets are not equivalent. git pull is split into two commands: git fetch git merge The problem is,

问题 The documentation at Github-Help: Syncing a Fork shows three commands to keep my GitHub fork in sync with the upstream repo. git fetch upstream git checkout master git merge upstream/master Can I use the following two commands instead of the above three? git checkout master git pull upstream/master Are the two sets of commands equivalent, or are there differences between them? 回答1: These command sets are not equivalent. git pull is split into two commands: git fetch git merge The problem is,