git-fork

问题 I made a fork of a GitHub repository. I fixed a bug, wrote a test and created a pull request which was merged into the original repository. So far, so good. Now I improved the test on my local machine. I want to create a new pull request with this improved test. But in the meantime, other commits have been made to the original, upstream repository. So I want to get my fork into sync with the upstream repository so that I can create the new pull request. Without fully grasping what I was doing

问题 I'm new to git, so forgive me for any mistakes I make with my terminology. I have a forked repo. In the origin repo, someone makes a pull request containing a bunch of different commits. That pull request is then merged into the origin. I would also like that pull request, so I want it merged into my repo too. What's the correct way of doing this? I tried cherry-picking each commit, and that worked, but I feel like that isn't the right way to get things done. Edit: I'll attempt to more

问题 I have forked a repository, but I'd like to keep it in sync with the upstream repository often. I have swapped some modules with my own implementation, so that means that every time I want to sync with the upstream repository, I keep getting the same merge conflicts over and over again. My question is: Is there a way to tell Git to use my own implementation for these case, rather than marking it as merge conflict? Is there something that I can automatize here, so I don't run into the same

问题 Here is the scenario I want to implement. The code of opensource Project-X is maintain by some other party (Party A). We (Party B) clone Project-X from GitHub (release branch) Party B do modifications locally Check-In to VSTS repository. Do the deployments from VSTS to Azure So, this is like Party-B only read updates from GitHub and push modifications that they do locally to VSTS (not Github). So actual read/write will take place to VSTS. GitHub will be only use to read changes done by 3rd

问题 Here is the scenario I want to implement. The code of opensource Project-X is maintain by some other party (Party A). We (Party B) clone Project-X from GitHub (release branch) Party B do modifications locally Check-In to VSTS repository. Do the deployments from VSTS to Azure So, this is like Party-B only read updates from GitHub and push modifications that they do locally to VSTS (not Github). So actual read/write will take place to VSTS. GitHub will be only use to read changes done by 3rd

问题 I'm in a project now that uses TFS and Git. And i've realized that i am not going to be able to Fork anymore so i thought i would ask you guys what you think about this as a solution. The problem i am having is that i have a "Base" project.That would be reused for every client we have. But each client has modifications to some extent (about 5-10%). I was planning to Fork project "A" into "Client_A" and make the changes needed. All the classes where changes can be made are implementations of

问题 I am working on a project using cocoapods and suddenly I see myself doing some changes in one of the libraries. How can I ensure that those changes will never be override by a pod update ? Is there any way to introduce changes in a pod without updating the github project? UPDATE : Forking a project I have tried to fork the project and create a new specfile to point to the new project. I was able to install the basic stuff, however, for some reason, there are some dependencies that are

问题 I have forked a repository from github - it's called bootstrap. I've cloned my fork: git clone https://github.com/Fowowski/bootstrap.git The bootstrap project has a master branch and a 3.0.0-wip branch - ill be working on 3.0.0-wip So next thing I do (since im on master and its a 2.3.x stable) is switch to 3.0.0-wip and add a remote: git checkout 3.0.0-wip git remote add upstream https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap.git and now im making some changes in the 1 file... after few days when I

问题 I have a set of documentation for my company's API, based on the excellent Slate framework from TripIt. Per instructions, I forked their repo and proceeded to customize it. That fork lives here. The obnoxious thing is that when contributors in my organization do a new pull request, the "base fork" on the Github "Comparing Changes" screen defaults to TripIt's repository, not my fork. They've more than once sent pull requests to the wrong place. Telling people "don't do that" isn't a

问题 I pull in a package using Composer with this composer.json: { "require": { "torophp/torophp": "dev-master", }, } When I run composer install it seems to pull this package from GitHub directly. I have created a fork of that repo on github with some small changes. Is there a way I can get composer to pull my version on GitHub instead of the original? 回答1: If this is your composer.json "require": { "torophp/torophp": "dev-master" } and you want to change it and use your fork instead, just add