fusion

VMware Fusion 11序列号 7HYY8-Z8WWY-F1MAN-ECKNY-LUXYX 文章来源: https://blog.csdn.net/qq_24095055/article/details/88869982

I want to write a small installer app that installs a web site and creates IIS virtual directories. The app should run on Windows XP/Server 2003 (IIS 6) as well as on Vista/2008 (IIS 7). The problem is: for IIS 6 we create virt dirs by calling WMI/Metabase API, for IIS 7 there is a much better API: Microsoft.Web.Administration, but its assembly is available only on IIS 7 systems. Naive approach: ... if (OperatingSystem == old) { call metabase API... } else { call Microsoft.Web.Administration... } ... Nice, isn't it? But how can I make sure that this does not crash on a old system just while

Are there any alternative Fusion Log Viewer programs, other than Fuslogvw.exe, or directing the Fusion log output to your own directory and then examining the tons of HTM files by hand? My two main gripes are: I'd like an overview that showed which assembly loads succeeded and which failed. I'm unsure of the resolution of the timestamps on the logging files, so I'm unsure of which entry comes before another entry. For example, my program is apparently trying to load an assembly with both culture=da and culture=da-dk. It should only be trying to load da-dk, and in fact that load is successful.

I'm interested, how is the dual input in a sensor fusioning setup in a Kalman filter modeled? Say for instance that you have an accelerometer and a gyro and want to present the "horizon level", like in an airplane, a good demo of something like this here. How do you actually harvest the two sensors positive properties and minimize the negative? Is this modeled in the Observation Model matrix (usually symbolized by capital H)? Remark: This question was also asked without any answers at math.stackexchange.com Usually, the sensor fusion problem is derived from the bayes theorem. Actually you have

I have a project that loads multiple versions of the same assembly using either Assembly.Load or Assembly.LoadFile. I then use Assembly.CreateInstance to create a type from that specific assembly. This works great until the type I'm creating references another dependent assembly. I need a way to intercept this specific assembly's request to load another assembly and provide it with the correct version (or, even better, probing path) to look for its dependency. This is required because v1 and v2 of the assemblies I'm creating with Assembly.CreateInstance will often need different versions of

One of our partners provided us with an assembly we need to access from our application. Unfortunately, this is not strong-name so we can't install it to the GAC. And we can't place it in the same place as our executable. Is there a solution for this? EDIT: This will be a temporary solution only for testing, when they go RC, we will have a strong-named assembly. You have a few options at that point. The first is to place the assembly in a directory that has the name of the assembly (without the extension) which is a subdirectory of the application directory . The second is to specify the sub

I have a unmanaged DLL (the scilexer.dll of Scintilla code editor, used by Scintilla.Net from CodePlex ) that is loaded from a managed application trough the Scintilla.Net component. The windows managed application runs without problem on both 32 and 64 bit environments, but I need to create different installations that uses the 64 or the 32 scilexer.dll. Is there a way to distribute both DLLs in 32 and 64 bit format so that the DLL loader of the .Net framework loads the unmanaged DLL in the 32 or 64 bit format depending on some .config option or some "path name magic" stuff? P/Invoke uses

I'm trying to form a cocise and conherent understanding of the application of lazy evaluation within the Java streams API. Here is what I currently understand: elements are only consumed as they are needed, i.e. streams are lazy, and intermediate operations are lazy such that e.g. filter, will only filter when it is required to. intermediate operations may be fused together (if they are stateless). short-circuiting operations do not need to process the entire stream. What I want to do is bring all these ideas together and ensure I'm not misrepresenting anything. I'm finding it tricky because