fpic

Linking a shared library against a static library: must the static library be compiled differently than if an application were linking it?

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-11-28 17:30:31
At least on Linux and Solaris, static libraries are really just a bunch of compiled .o's tossed into one big file. When compiling a static library, usually the -fpic flag is ommited, so the generated code is position dependent. Now say my static library is B. I've built it and have the resulting .a file which is really just a glob of all of the position dependent .o files. Now I have a shared library I'd like to build, A, and I want it to statically link B. When I build A, naturally I'll use the -fpic flag to make the generated code position independent. But if I link against B, aren't I

Shared libraries and .h files

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-11-28 16:55:07
I have some doubt about how do programs use shared library. When I build a shared library ( with -shared -fPIC switches) I make some functions available from an external program. Usually I do a dlopen() to load the library and then dlsym() to link the said functions to some function pointers. This approach does not involve including any .h file. Is there a way to avoid doing dlopen() & dlsym() and just including the .h of the shared library? I guess this may be how c++ programs uses code stored in system shared library. ie just including stdlib.h etc. Nick, I think all the other answers are

Shared library on Linux and -fPIC error

北城以北 提交于 2019-11-28 03:35:34
问题 I am trying to compile a shared library in Linux using a Makefile created with Cmake, but running make I obtain the following error: Linking CXX shared library libcpp-lib.so /usr/bin/ld: /home/davide/Desktop/boost_1_55_0/stage/lib/libboost_system.a(error_code.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against .rodata.str1.1 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /home/davide/Desktop/boost_1_55_0/stage/lib/libboost_system.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1

What is the difference between `-fpic` and `-fPIC` gcc parameters?

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-11-27 17:09:10
I've already read the gcc manpage, but I still can't understand the difference between -fpic and -fPIC . Can someone explain it, in a very simple and clear way? Related questions: What does -fPIC mean when building a shared library? What, if any, are the implications of compiling objects with gcc -fPIC flag if they get used in executables? Anycorn http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html Use -fPIC or -fpic to generate position independent code. Whether to use -fPIC or -fpic to generate position independent code is target-dependent. The -fPIC choice always works, but

What does -fPIC mean when building a shared library?

天涯浪子 提交于 2019-11-27 17:00:53
I know the ' -fPIC ' option has something to do with resolving addresses and independence between individual modules, but I'm not sure what it really means. Can you explain? sean riley PIC stands for Position Independent Code and to quote man gcc : If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent code, suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the size of the global offset table. This option makes a difference on the m68k, PowerPC and SPARC. Position-independent code requires special support, and therefore works only on certain machines. use this when building shared

Trying to load position independent code on cortex-m3

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-11-27 12:32:12
问题 I have an embedded application which will have a bootloader which will decide to run 1 of two applications directly from internal flash. I am trying to make these apps position independent so that they both can be compiled for the same base address. There is no operating system, so no dynamic linker is available. So far I have tried building with -fpie option (using gcc) with not too much success. The function calls appear to be correct but the global data does not have the correct address.

Linking a shared library against a static library: must the static library be compiled differently than if an application were linking it?

99封情书 提交于 2019-11-27 10:32:53
问题 At least on Linux and Solaris, static libraries are really just a bunch of compiled .o's tossed into one big file. When compiling a static library, usually the -fpic flag is ommited, so the generated code is position dependent. Now say my static library is B. I've built it and have the resulting .a file which is really just a glob of all of the position dependent .o files. Now I have a shared library I'd like to build, A, and I want it to statically link B. When I build A, naturally I'll use

Shared libraries and .h files

耗尽温柔 提交于 2019-11-27 09:53:59
问题 I have some doubt about how do programs use shared library. When I build a shared library ( with -shared -fPIC switches) I make some functions available from an external program. Usually I do a dlopen() to load the library and then dlsym() to link the said functions to some function pointers. This approach does not involve including any .h file. Is there a way to avoid doing dlopen() & dlsym() and just including the .h of the shared library? I guess this may be how c++ programs uses code

What is the difference between `-fpic` and `-fPIC` gcc parameters?

十年热恋 提交于 2019-11-26 22:31:26
问题 I've already read the gcc manpage, but I still can't understand the difference between -fpic and -fPIC . Can someone explain it, in a very simple and clear way? Related questions: What does -fPIC mean when building a shared library? What, if any, are the implications of compiling objects with gcc -fPIC flag if they get used in executables? 回答1: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html Use -fPIC or -fpic to generate position independent code. Whether to use -fPIC or

What does -fPIC mean when building a shared library?

一世执手 提交于 2019-11-26 22:29:57
问题 I know the ' -fPIC ' option has something to do with resolving addresses and independence between individual modules, but I'm not sure what it really means. Can you explain? 回答1: PIC stands for Position Independent Code and to quote man gcc : If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent code, suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the size of the global offset table. This option makes a difference on the m68k, PowerPC and SPARC. Position-independent code