divide-and-conquer

Tromino program using Graphics

不羁的心 提交于 2019-12-13 19:07:24
问题 I have my tromino program. However, now that it needs to be converted to graphics (which I left for last). I am pretty confused on how to do this, I know some basics about graphics but looking at my program it seems I might have to do a lot of modification to make it work. Is there a simple way to do this? Basically I need to convert the trominos which I have as numbers right now onto a chessboard (which the size is specified by the user). And the deficient square being any color that

How to add all vector elements using divide and conquer and iterators?

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-13 05:38:39
问题 I needed to write a function that sums up all elements of a vector. Specifications are that it has to be done by recursion and the only parameters input would be iterators. The function should:Divide the vector in half, recurse on the left hand side, recurse on the right hand side, return the sum of both sides. I wrote the code below but I am getting an incorrect answer. int sumVectorRecurse(vector<int>::iterator left, vector<int>::iterator right) { if (left != right){ int midPosition =

Problem with Divide and Conquer Maximum Consecutive Subarray (MCS)

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-12-12 20:47:37
问题 I want to find a nonempty, contiguous subarray for a given input array of integers, that can have duplicate values. I tried the divide and conquer method to find the maximum consecutive subarray of an array, which returns a different result as expected. Please find the code below. private static int maxSumRec(int[] a, int low, int high) { int leftSum = 0, rightSum = 0; int sum = 0; if (low == high) { // Base case return a[low]; } int mid = (low + high) >> 1; // (low + high) / 2 int maxLeftSum

Divide and conquer - why does it work?

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-12-12 13:35:06
问题 I know that algorithms like mergesort and quicksort use the divide-and-conquer paradigm, but I'm wondering why does it work in lowering the time complexity... why does usually a "divide and conquer" algorithm work better than a non-divide-and-conquer one? 回答1: Divide and conquer works, because the mathematics supports it! Consider a few divide and conquer algorithms: 1) Binary search: This algorithm reduces your input space to half each time. It is intuitively clear that this is better than a

Grouping Symbols Maximum Length Balanced Subsequence

安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-12 08:15:26
问题 Consider B to be a sequence of grouping symbols (, ), [, ], {, and }. B is called a Balanced sequence if it is of length 0 or B is of one of the following forms: { X } Y or [ X ] Y or { X } Y where X and Y are Balanced themselves. Example for Balanced : ( ) - { [ ] ( ) } [ ] - ... Now the question is to find an efficient algorithm to find maximum length balanced subsequence (not necessarily contiguous) of a given input which is an string of these grouping symbols. For example if input is ( )

Matrix Multiplication using divide and conquer approach [closed]

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-12-12 01:39:07
问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 3 years ago . I am a beginner in programming and just learned new concepts and started writing code for matrix multiplication but I got confused in pointers and others so I am uploading my code here in seek of guidelines. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int **matrixMultiply(int A[][8], int B[][8], int row); int main()

Simple Divide and Conquer Example

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-12 00:28:35
问题 Here is my test divide and conquer program, but it gives me an error. I am heading in the right direction? public class getSum { static int sum = 0; public static void main(String[] args) { int[] numbers = {2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2}; int amount = 0; amount = sumArray(0,numbers.length,numbers); System.out.print(amount); } public static int sumArray(int first, int last, int[] A){ int index = last - first; if(index == 1){ return sum; }else if(index <= 4 && index > 1){ for(int i = first; first < last; i++

How to solve “fixed size maximum subarray” using divide and conquer approach?

a 夏天 提交于 2019-12-11 05:29:50
问题 Disclaimer: I know this problem can be solved with single pass of array very efficiently, but I am interested in doing this with divide and conquer because it is bit different than typical problems we tackle with divide and conquer. Suppose you are given a floating point array X[1:n] of size n and interval length l. The problem is to design a divide and conquer algorithm to find the sub-array of length l from the array that has the maximum sum. Here is what I came up with.For array of length

Is Quick Sort a Divide & Conquer approach? [closed]

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-07 16:19:53
问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . I consider Merge sort as divide and conquer because, Divide - Array is literally divided into sub arrays without any processing (compare/swap), and the problem sized is halved/Quartered/.... Conquer - merge() those sub arrays by processing (compare/swap) Code gives an

Divide and Conquer Algo to find maximum difference between two ordered elements

痴心易碎 提交于 2019-12-06 03:00:58
Given an array arr[] of integers, find out the difference between any two elements such that larger element appears after the smaller number in arr[]. Max Difference = Max { arr[x] - arr[y] | x > y } Examples: If array is [2, 3, 10, 6, 4, 8, 1, 7] then returned value should be 8 (Diff between 10 and 2). If array is [ 7, 9, 5, 6, 3, 2 ] then returned value should be 2 (Diff between 7 and 9) My Algorithm: I thought of using D&C algorithm. Explanation 2, 3, 10, 6, 4, 8, 1, 7 then 2,3,10,6 and 4,8,1,7 then 2,3 and 10,6 and 4,8 and 1,7 then 2 and 3 10 and 6 4 and 8 1 and 7 Here as these elements