distributed-caching

I try to find how to implement distributed caching for applications. Ehcache already used for caching in my project, that's why I search how to solve this issue using it. But, unfortunately, it seems, that Terracotta Enterprise Suite is needed for this and it is commercial. Isn't it? Is there another solution how to use Ehcache for distributed caching (RMI or anything else)? Alex Snaps You don't need terracotta enterprise suite to cluster you Ehcache instances. So you can use clustering with Ehcache & Terracotta today, with pure OSS : http://www.ehcache.org/documentation/configuration

I have an extension method for the Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCache object found in the Windows Server AppFabric SDK that looks like this: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching; namespace Caching { public static class CacheExtensions { private static Dictionary<string, object> locks = new Dictionary<string, object>(); public static T Fetch<T>(this DataCache @this, string key, Func<T> func) { return @this.Fetch(key, func, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)); } public static T Fetch<T>(this DataCache @this, string key, Func<T> func, TimeSpan

What is the real difference between nonstrict-read-write and read-write ? I can read ehcache and Hibernate docs, but as far as I can see they only say that "read-write is better if you do updates". I find it unsatisfactory. I may have an issue with long-lived cached collection configured like this: <cache name="trx.domain.Parent.children" maxElementsInMemory="5000" eternal="false" overflowToDisk="false" timeToIdleSeconds="1200" timeToLiveSeconds="1800"> <cacheEventListenerFactory class="net.sf.ehcache.distribution.RMICacheReplicatorFactory" properties="replicateAsynchronously=true,

One of the decisions I need to make is what caching framework to use in my system. With so many to choose from, I am currently investigating redis, ehcache and memcached. Can anyone point to performance benchmarks of these three particular frameworks? Also an overview of their features - I am particularly interested in disadvantages, ie. situations where you would use one over the other. user4444 A small feature comparison is here: http://toddrobinson.com/appfabric/appfabric-cache-feature-comparisons/ UPDATE 25.02.2016 Dead link fixed thanks to WebArchive.org: http://web.archive.org/web

I have a task to build a prototype for a massively scalable distributed shared memory (DSM) app. The prototype would only serve as a proof-of-concept, but I want to spend my time most effectively by picking the components which would be used in the real solution later on. The aim of this solution is to take data input from an external source, churn it and make the result available for a number of frontends. Those "frontends" would just take the data from the cache and serve it without extra processing. The amount of frontend hits on this data can literally be millions per second. The data

I want to use MongoDb as cacche store for the infinispan to persist the data evicted according to policy i am posting the snippet of the code that is causing exception along with the exception ConfigurationBuilder config = new ConfigurationBuilder(); MongoDBCacheStore strgBuilder = new MongoDBCacheStore(); ConfigurationBuilder b = new ConfigurationBuilder(); b.persistence() .addStore(MongoDBCacheStoreConfigurationBuilder.class) .host( "localhost" ) .port( 27017 ) .timeout( 1500 ) .acknowledgment( 0 ) .username( "" ) .password( "" ) .database( "infinispan_cachestore" ) .collection( "entries" );

I've been paying some attention to Microsoft's fairly recent promoting of Velocity as a distributed caching solution that would compete with the likes of Memcached. I've been looking for a 64bit version of Memcached for Windows for some time now with no luck, and since everything about the ASP.Net MVC project I'm working on is 64bit, it doesn't make sense to use anything but 64bit. Now we're already hedging our bets with ASP.NET MVC in Beta (RTM soon hopefully), but StackOverflow doesn't seem to be doing too badly, so I have limited concerns there. But Velocity is still very much an unknown