code-coverage

问题 I have a problem to get the coverage from my classes with opencover. I have a Viewer.dll with the main classes and a Viewer_Test.dll with the tests for the viewer. After executing the commands all tests run as expected. OpenCover.Console.exe -register:user -target:"$(nunitpath)/nunit-console-x86.exe" -targetargs:"/noshadow Viewer_Tests.dll /domain:single" -filter:+[*]* -output:coverage.xml ReportGenerator.exe coverage.xml "coveragereport" html If I look in the generated report I find only the

问题 I am fairly new to JaCoCo and I am having trouble generating my code coverage report. This is my project structure: My integration tests live within the "...-integration-tests" module. When I build my project using mvn I get the following in my logging: [INFO] Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing classes directory: ...-integration-tests\target\classes This is true because my compiled code is only available in the target>classes of the corresponding module. What is the best way to make

问题 My project-structure stuff/stuff.go -> package: stuff test/stuff/stuff_test.go -> package: test Although stuff_test executes code from stuff.go it shows coverage: 0.0% of statements I used go test -cover If I move my *_test.go to the stuff-folder of the program it is working fine. Or perhaps my approach of the project-structure is not well designed/go-conform? 回答1: Cross-package test coverage is not directly supported, but several people have built wrappers to merge individual coverage

问题 I am writing part of a PHP web application (which will be used in a high school bug finding contest) where the user must find bugs in a given Java program. As a part of this, when the Java program executes, we want to highlight the lines of the source of the Java program where the code has executed. To do this, all we need are the line numbers of the source that have been executed, that is, the code path (or is it called code coverage?). We will highlight the lines in the source file using

问题 I'm trying to exclude generated files by GreenDao framework, which placed in a package named dao, from my code coverage report generated by Jacoco, but creating a custom task like following doesn't work. def coverageSourceDirs = [ '../app/src/main/java' ] task jacocoTestReport(type: JacocoReport, dependsOn: "testDebug") { group = "Reporting" description = "Generate Jacoco coverage reports after running tests." reports { xml.enabled = true html.enabled = true } classDirectories = fileTree( dir

问题 The D language compiler DMD outputs its coverage analysis in a file containing the original source as | inout(Ix)[] prefix() inout | { 2037| assert(!keys.empty); 2037| final switch (keys.length) | { 000000000| case 1: 000000000| return keys.at!0[]; 2037| case 2: | import std.algorithm.searching : commonPrefix; 2037| return commonPrefix(keys.at!0[], keys.at!1[]); | } | } that is, the original source where each line has been prefixed by a 10-character column containing the execution count (if

问题 My project consists of 6 microservices in java and I am trying to figure out how to merge the html reports from Jacoco into one overall coverage report. As it stands now I end up with a report for each service and it would be nice to have an aggregated one so I can more easily put it into our CI for visibility etc. I've tried various things I've found on web searches, but I end up with an empty coverage file when I try those suggestions. Here is my gradle file: subprojects { apply plugin:

问题 For example, map access like this: func (pool *fPool) fetch(url string) *ResultPromise { pool.cacheLock.RLock() if rp, pres := pool.cache[url]; pres { pool.cacheLock.RUnlock() return rp } pool.cacheLock.RUnlock() pool.cacheLock.Lock() if rp, pres := pool.cache[url]; pres { pool.cacheLock.Unlock() // Skip adding url if someone snuck it in between RUnlock an Lock return rp } rp := newPromise() pool.cache[url] = rp pool.cacheLock.Unlock() pool.c <- fetchWork{rp, url} return rp } Here, the

问题 For example, map access like this: func (pool *fPool) fetch(url string) *ResultPromise { pool.cacheLock.RLock() if rp, pres := pool.cache[url]; pres { pool.cacheLock.RUnlock() return rp } pool.cacheLock.RUnlock() pool.cacheLock.Lock() if rp, pres := pool.cache[url]; pres { pool.cacheLock.Unlock() // Skip adding url if someone snuck it in between RUnlock an Lock return rp } rp := newPromise() pool.cache[url] = rp pool.cacheLock.Unlock() pool.c <- fetchWork{rp, url} return rp } Here, the

问题 For example, map access like this: func (pool *fPool) fetch(url string) *ResultPromise { pool.cacheLock.RLock() if rp, pres := pool.cache[url]; pres { pool.cacheLock.RUnlock() return rp } pool.cacheLock.RUnlock() pool.cacheLock.Lock() if rp, pres := pool.cache[url]; pres { pool.cacheLock.Unlock() // Skip adding url if someone snuck it in between RUnlock an Lock return rp } rp := newPromise() pool.cache[url] = rp pool.cacheLock.Unlock() pool.c <- fetchWork{rp, url} return rp } Here, the