clustered-index

In MySQL, how can we tell if an index of a table is clustered or not?

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2020-04-16 09:15:12
问题 In MySQL, how can we tell if an index of a table is clustered or not? We can use show index from table-name to get information about the table's indexes. But I don't find it shows whether each index is clustered or nonclustered. This is for the purpose of If a table in MySQL has any index, must the table have a clustered index? 回答1: In the default storage engine, InnoDB, the PRIMARY KEY index is always the clustered index. If you don't have a PRIMARY KEY, it's the first UNIQUE KEY index on

Why my Azure SQL Database indexes are still fragmented?

牧云@^-^@ 提交于 2020-01-14 05:40:16
问题 My company has committed the sin of using GUIDs as Primary Keys on our Azure SQL Database tables (it is actually worse than that: we used VARCHAR(36) instead of UNIQUEIDENTIFIER). As such, we end up with fragmented indexes. They looked like this: CREATE TABLE OldTable ( Id VARCHAR(36) PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED NOT NULL DEFAULT NEWID(), CreateTime DATETIME2 NOT NULL, ... ) I "fixed" the problem by creating new tables. This time, I used an immutable, ever-increasing DATETIME2 (e.g. CreateTime)

What happens after inserting data to a table with default clustered index in SQL

雨燕双飞 提交于 2020-01-06 05:26:11
问题 I am working on MS SQL server. I have a table called "User" with three columns and default index which is created with Primary Key of the table, of UserId. I have a word file that contains user information line by line. There are almost 10000 lines. I have a program that reads the user information from the word file and inserts it into the database. It is written with C# in visual studio. The program uses repository and unitofwork pattern. The program workflow is as follows: 1) read a single

How does PostgreSQL's CLUSTER differ from a clustered index in SQL Server?

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2020-01-03 11:16:50
问题 Many posts like this stackoverflow link claim that there is no concept of a clustered index in PostgreSQL. However, the PostgreSQL documentation contains something similar. A few people claim it is similar to a clustered index in SQL Server. Do you know what the exact difference between these two is, if there is any? 回答1: A clustered index or index organized table is a data structure where all the table data are organized in index order, typically by organizing the table in a B-tree structure

How does PostgreSQL's CLUSTER differ from a clustered index in SQL Server?

♀尐吖头ヾ 提交于 2020-01-03 11:11:49
问题 Many posts like this stackoverflow link claim that there is no concept of a clustered index in PostgreSQL. However, the PostgreSQL documentation contains something similar. A few people claim it is similar to a clustered index in SQL Server. Do you know what the exact difference between these two is, if there is any? 回答1: A clustered index or index organized table is a data structure where all the table data are organized in index order, typically by organizing the table in a B-tree structure

Should a Sequential Guid primary key column be a clustered index?

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-12-30 10:52:49
问题 The goal of using a sequential guid is so you can use clustered indexes without the high levels of fragmentation that would normally exist in a clustered index if it was a regular guid, correct? 回答1: Yes, you are correct. 回答2: First to clarify, a primary key and clustered index are 2 separate and distinct things, i.e. one is not coupled to the other (PKs can be nonclustered, clustered indexes can be non-PKs). That given, I think you're asking more "Should a Sequential GUID be used as a

Should a Sequential Guid primary key column be a clustered index?

孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-30 10:52:07
问题 The goal of using a sequential guid is so you can use clustered indexes without the high levels of fragmentation that would normally exist in a clustered index if it was a regular guid, correct? 回答1: Yes, you are correct. 回答2: First to clarify, a primary key and clustered index are 2 separate and distinct things, i.e. one is not coupled to the other (PKs can be nonclustered, clustered indexes can be non-PKs). That given, I think you're asking more "Should a Sequential GUID be used as a

Why/when/how is whole clustered index scan chosen rather than full table scan?

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-12-29 07:11:33
问题 IMO, please correct me... the leaf of clustered index contains the real table row, so full clustered index, with intermediate leaves, contain much more data than the full table(?) Why/when/how is ever whole clustered index scan chosen over the full table scan? How is clustered index on CUSTOMER_ID column used in SELECT query which does not contain it in either SELECT list or in WHERE condition [1]? Update: Should I understand that full clustered scan is faster than full table scan because

Setting clustered index in nhibernate

蹲街弑〆低调 提交于 2019-12-24 03:56:10
问题 I'm trying to define a property that is not the id as a clustered index in nhibernate, yet I've found no way of doing this. Could anyone give me a pointer of how this is done, or it is something not currently available in nhibernate? Thanks in advance 回答1: You can use <database-object> to create indexes and other artifacts. http://nhibernate.info/doc/nhibernate-reference/mapping.html#mapping-database-object 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3070355/setting-clustered-index-in-nhibernate

In Entity Framework code-first, why are primary keys always stored as clustered indexes?

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2019-12-24 02:23:54
问题 I'm learning more about indexes in general, and clustered indexes in particular. In this article by Markus Winand, he makes an excellent case for not using the primary key of a table as the clustering key. He stresses index-only scans over using clustered indexes, and shows how you can use non-clustered indexes to get really fast results. Can someone explain why Entity Framework code-first does not provide the means to store a table as a non-clustered-index? What are the benefits of having