call-hierarchy

Eclipse IDE - Open Call Hierarchy is empty/broken

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-11-30 07:45:14
问题 What should I do, if the "Open Call Hierarchy" is broken (empty for every method in a project)? It only shows the name of the method I wanted to see the call hierarchy for. This happens for all methods I try, even though they are all called by other methods. It is very useful for code navigation. I do not know how to work without it! I've tried: Opening eclipse.exe -clean -refresh Restarting Eclipse Closing and reopening the project Updating the project Renaming the .metadata file I've

Eclipse IDE - Open Call Hierarchy is empty/broken

烈酒焚心 提交于 2019-11-29 05:26:01
What should I do, if the "Open Call Hierarchy" is broken (empty for every method in a project)? It only shows the name of the method I wanted to see the call hierarchy for. This happens for all methods I try, even though they are all called by other methods. It is very useful for code navigation. I do not know how to work without it! I've tried: Opening eclipse.exe -clean -refresh Restarting Eclipse Closing and reopening the project Updating the project Renaming the .metadata file I've checked that it searches the whole workspace, and there are no filters on. Skip The following may help:

More Intelligent Eclipse “Open Call Hierarchy”?

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-11-28 07:48:06
问题 If I have a Java project in Eclipse, I can right-click on a method name and "Open Call Hierarchy." Suppose I have two interfaces, A and B, that both specify a method x(). Is it possible for me to have Eclipse use "Open Call Hierarchy" in a more intelligent way so as to only show calls to x() from A's while not showing those from B's? 回答1: Eclipse should already do this. If you want to test it, go to your A interface, select the x() method and run 'Open Call Hierarchy' on it. Do the same for

how to trace function call in C?

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-11-27 11:43:59
Without modifying the source code, how can i trace which functions are called and with what parameters, when some function(say func100 in the following example) is invoked. I would like the output to be as follows: enter func100(p1001=xxx,p1002=xxx) enter func110(p1101=xxx,p1102=xxx) exit func110(p1101=xxx,p1102=xxx) enter func120(p1201=xxx,p1202=xxx,p1203=xxx) enter func121(p1211=xxx) exit func121(p1211=xxx) exit func120(p1201=xxx,p1202=xxx,p1203=xxx) exit func100(p1001=xxx,p1002=xxx) is this doable? or what's the solution with minimum modification of source code? If you use gcc , you can use

Order of calling constructors/destructors in inheritance

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-11-26 07:23:59
A little question about creating objects. Say I have these two classes: struct A{ A(){cout << "A() C-tor" << endl;} ~A(){cout << "~A() D-tor" << endl;} }; struct B : public A{ B(){cout << "B() C-tor" << endl;} ~B(){cout << "~B() D-tor" << endl;} A a; }; and in main I create an instance of B : int main(){ B b; } Note that B derives from A and also has a field of type A . I am trying to figure out the rules. I know that when constructing an object first calls its parent constructor, and vice versa when destructing. What about fields ( A a; in this case)? When B is created, when will it call A 's

Order of calling constructors/destructors in inheritance

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-11-26 01:58:28
问题 A little question about creating objects. Say I have these two classes: struct A{ A(){cout << \"A() C-tor\" << endl;} ~A(){cout << \"~A() D-tor\" << endl;} }; struct B : public A{ B(){cout << \"B() C-tor\" << endl;} ~B(){cout << \"~B() D-tor\" << endl;} A a; }; and in main I create an instance of B : int main(){ B b; } Note that B derives from A and also has a field of type A . I am trying to figure out the rules. I know that when constructing an object first calls its parent constructor, and