biztalk

I am developing a schema for flat file disassembly in BizTalk 2013. However, I have a big problem with the schema, since the parsing result is rubbish. The flat file type I am parsing looks like this: HEADER:opt1:opt2:opt3+opt4:opt5+opt6+op7:opt8:opt9' TAG1:opt1:opt2:opt3+opt4:opt5:opt6+op7:opt8:opt9' TAG2:opt1:opt2:opt3+opt4:opt5:opt6+op7:opt8:opt9' TAG3:opt1:opt2:opt3+opt4++opt6+op7:opt8:opt9' TAG4:opt1:opt2:opt3+opt4:opt5' The flat file has three hierarchy parts: Top level: Segments , delimited by ' characters (not the line break, this was just added for better readability) Middle level:

Is a (full) BizTalk 2010 installation needed to let a build server (TFS2010) build BizTalk 2010 solutions/projects ? Jehan33 As per my knowledge, BizTalk 2010 installation is not required. You only need below components. Project Build Component available under Additional Software(to build the project) Developer Tools and SDK (to run tests) I did find an apparent exception where if you deal with anything EDI related, it seems to require the full BizTalk install(not configuration). I wanted to add this footnote for people experiencing compile errors where local compile works fine. 来源： https:/

It seems that Biztalk only supports making rules via the Business Rules Composer, a design-time tool. Everywhere I see "programmatic" referring to Biztalk's Business Rules Engine (BRE), I only see that you can execute the rules in .NET, but not actually create them. I have found the Microsoft.RuleEngine namespace, but the documentation is abysmal, with zero examples and I can't even tell if you can use it to create a rule, or just retrieve the rules (one example I found). Is anyone aware of whether this API exists and/or blogs/references/docs that might be helpful. I think I found a partial

Is it possible to use the Biztalk adapter pack whithout a Biztalk installation (Biztalk license is available)? I want to use the Biztalk Adapter for SAP RFC calls within a .NET Application (as a replacement of the SAP Connector for .NET , which is unfortunately no longer maintened by SAP and I don't can use third party products like " ErpConnect "). Makes this idea sense or not ? This questions can be also seen in conjunction of my question concerning connecting SAP and Microsoft ( Microsoft and SAP ) The adapters in the Biztalk adapter pack are build on the WCF LOB adapter SDK, so it's

My situation is: Old developer left without the code so I can not add any enhancement or fix the bug. Do we have any service/tool that I can reverse the Orchestration (+ Mapping) to original format (from DLL/MSI, or Running BizTalk application)? If the reverse won't work I would like to see the Orchestration flow like the Visual studio designer. That's is good enough for me to trace everything You have several options Use a de-compiler (such as .NET Reflector ). You can then extract a string that is the contents of the ODX file as well as the XSLT for any maps. (I copied the string called

My receive port is of sqlBinding and typed polling. It invokes a SP to fetch a record and based on filter condition the corresponding orchestration kicks off. The BizTalk group consists of 2 servers; thus 2 ReceiveHostInstances. If both the host instances are running -at some point the same request is being read twice - causing a duplicate at the receivers end. But, why is the reeive port reading it the same record more than once? The proc which reads the updates the record and updates it so that it wont be fecthed again. I observed this scenario while submitting 10 requests; receive port read

If I want to call a web service or wcf method from an orchestration, I can do it by either adding a service reference to the project or adding a generated item. What is the advantage of either approach - is there a best practice? Steef -Jan Wiggers answers a similar question here TL;DR - Always use the Generated Items wizard . My 10c - Although the .xsd files imported by Add Service is added as a schema and set to BtsCompile, there are some limitations such as: Add Service Reference will add the client proxy, which isn't needed in a BizTalk project (and which might 'tempt' your devs to do

I'm trying to use BizTalk for communicating between two web services. It has to be like this: Service1 gets an input and sends message through BizTalk to Service2 , Service2 responds that message, forwards it to BizTalk, and delivers it to Service1 . Finally Service1 returns the response to user. I'm trying hard to do it for days, but I couldn't manage to build orchestration without compiler errors, and I couldn't find a single piece of example with web services and web ports with typing inputs. I started to believe that this is impossible, at least with BizTalk. The big question is: Is it